Laserfiche WebLink
LL Cityof CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />Louisville AGENDA ITEM 2 <br />COLORADO • SINCE 1878 <br />SUBJECT: FISCAL IMPACT MODEL OVERVIEW <br />DATE: MAY 14, 2024 <br />PRESENTED BY: ROB ZUCCARO, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br />DIRECTOR <br />SUMMARY: <br />Staff is presenting an overview of the City's Fiscal Impact Model. The City uses fiscal <br />impact analysis to inform some types of development review and for land use policy <br />development. The Finance Committee reviewed the Fiscal Impact Model at their <br />February 22, 2024 meeting. As a follow up to that review, and in anticipation of <br />upcoming land use policy discussions as part of the Comprehensive Plan update <br />project, this is an opportunity for all of Council to become more familiar with fiscal <br />impact analysis methodologies, and the potential benefits and limitations of fiscal impact <br />analysis in policy development. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Fiscal impact analysis is a tool that a city uses to estimate revenues and costs that may <br />result from new development or land uses changes. Different land uses, such as <br />industrial, office, retail, and residential land uses, will have different impacts on city <br />revenue and costs to provide services and infrastructure to those uses. Each land use <br />scenario has different tax and fee structures and demands on city services. The fiscal <br />impact analysis estimates city revenues from one-time fees such as permitting and <br />development impact fees, and ongoing tax revenues anticipated from the development. <br />The analysis compares those revenues to the estimated costs to the city to provide and <br />expand services and public infrastructure when necessary, and provides the net result. <br />It is important to recognize that a fiscal model does not reflect market conditions that <br />may or may not be present to support certain land use scenarios. For example, a city <br />may want to promote commercial development for tax revenue purposes. A fiscal <br />analysis of a primarily commercial development will show a net positive fiscal benefit to <br />the city. However, if market conditions do not support commercial development in the <br />location planned, such commercial development will likely not take place. If a city is <br />promoting new development or redevelopment in these areas to achieve other city <br />policies or goals, market feasibility should be a consideration in addition to fiscal <br />analysis. <br />Additionally, policies that promote non-commercial development can provide secondary <br />positive fiscal impacts to the city not captured in a fiscal analysis model. Such <br />development may provide support to other existing sales tax generating developments <br />or create demand for new sales tax generating development. There can also be <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />2 <br />