My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 02 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 02 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 10:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/2/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 02 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayer asked if the Wood family's position is that the road be routed south of all their <br />property. <br /> <br />Susan Hudson replied, yes. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that this alignment would completely bisect Boulder County Open Space <br />and Glacier Bay, cutting significantly into the Rock Creek Farm area. He suggested <br />consulting with the Boulder County Commissioners to determine why they support the <br />current alignment and what they want to protect in doing so. <br /> <br />Susan Hudson stated that at the Boulder County Commissioners public meeting last week <br />they were told that there are owls that perch on the sanctuary every spring. She stated that <br />those owls perch in the trees located on her father's property every day during the spring. <br /> <br />MaYer replied that he would be willing to speak to the Boulder County Commissioners. <br />He stated that during negotiations, the County felt very strongly about not bisecting these <br />properties. <br /> <br />Susan Hudson stated she is a resident of Broomfield. She expressed frustration that <br />Broomfield is pushing this parkway to avoid remaining a bedroom community. <br /> <br />Mayer agreed that Broomfield has a strong interest in the road. He thanked Susan Hudson <br />for expressing her concerns and providing him with some insight prior to discussing the <br />County's concerns with the Commissioners. He questioned whether the Helm's property <br />is 20 acres in size, as the map indicates. He stated that if the City of Louisville developed <br />all their land in this area, it would require significant additional water resources. The only <br />option appears to be investing in another pipeline, which is both problematic as well as <br />very expensive. He stated that this agreement serves Louisville well in terms of serving <br />the area and preserving its infrastructure. He expressed willingness to entertain the <br />County's proposed amendments regarding Paradise Lane. He stated that a lot of the <br />difficulties stem from the number of interests that had to be balanced during the <br />Intergovernmental Agreement negotiations. He expressed support for the agreement as it <br />provides significant benefits to the City of Louisville. <br /> <br />Howard asked to respond to John Mayhoffer's concerns. He explained that the City of <br />Louisville is in a position that they would prefer not to be in - forced to make decisions <br />on issues that are a direct result of the planned shopping center. He stated that a request <br />made by Robert Hoyle and others was to move the road two hundred feet to the south. He <br />expressed support for moving the highway south, however, he was uncertain that Boulder <br />County would agree to use a portion of their open space to do so. He asked if George <br />Mallon, who spoke earlier, was available to answer questions. He explained when the <br />issue of annexation for Paradise Lane was proposed, the City of Louisville was concerned <br />that the City of Broomfield would annex a significant portion of Louisville's planning <br />zone. In response, the City of Louisville offered tremendous incentives to property <br />owners, including those on Paradise Lane, to annex into the City of Louisville. The <br />residents of Paradise Lane did not want to annex into the City of Louisville. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.