Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 14, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 18 <br /> <br />The following table summarizes the assessment of each site based on the <br /> <br /> <br />six (6) evaluation criteria discussed above: <br />Alternative Coverage Availability Exposure Access Views Environment <br />Harper Lake Negative Negative Negative <br />(36 homes) <br />N. Water Treatment (10 homes) <br />(Existing Location) <br />S. Boulder Rd. & Negative Negative (10 homes) Negative <br />Washington Ave. <br />N. Water Treatment Negative (8 homes) Negative <br />(HOA Option #1) <br />N. Water Treatment Negative Negative <br />(HOA Option #2) (Constructability) (38 homes) <br />The Police Negative Negative <br />Department (38 homes) <br />The Recreation Negative Negative <br />Center (56 homes) <br />No Siren Negative <br />Russ continued with a review of the Special Review Use criteria by stating <br />Criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been met while Criteria 5 is not applicable to this <br />application. Therefore, staff is in support of this request with no conditions. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Lipton asked what it would cost to move the tower. <br />Goodman stated it would cost approximately $6,000 to relocate. The cost does <br />not include any other possible site improvements. <br />Loo asked what the height difference is between a street light pole on McCaslin <br />and the siren pole. <br />Russ stated the siren pole is approximately 40 – 45 feet and he does not know <br />the height of a street pole. <br />Loo asked several questions about the service trucks. <br />Russ stated the trucks require a considerable amount of area. <br />Loo asked why there is no SRU on the other locations. <br />Russ stated there had been no complaints with the other sites therefore they <br />would not be brought forward with the SRU requirements. <br />Lipton asked who owns the large commercial tower on the north side of the lake. <br />Goodman stated the tower is owned by Boulder County with a lease to the <br />private property owner. <br />Lipton asked Goodman for additional information about the tower height. <br />Goodman stated the tower could be as high at 60’ with an additional 10’ in the <br />ground. <br />Lipton asked if the pole height could be lowered. <br />Goodman stated the pole height could not be less. The height of the tower would <br />need to stay at the current height to provide the required coverage. <br /> <br />