My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2010 11 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2010 11 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:19 AM
Creation date
2/4/2011 11:54:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2010 11 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 18, 2010 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br /> <br />Lipton moved and Brauneis seconded a motion to continue Res. No. 29 to the <br /> <br />December 9, 2010meeting with direction to staff to bring the applicant back for <br />the Commission to review the application as an SRU request. <br />Sheets proposed a substitute motion and Loo seconded a motion to approve <br />Resolution No. 29, Series 2010 with the one condition proposed by staff. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton No <br />Chris Pritchard No <br />Susan S. Loo Yes <br />Ann O’Connell Yes <br />Monica Sheets Yes <br />Steve Brauneis Yes <br />Scott Russell Yes <br />Motion passed: 5 to 2 <br />The substitute motion passed therefore the original motion dies. <br />The following items are scheduled for December 9, 2010 <br />tentatively <br /> <br />Alley Cat – PUD and SRU <br /> <br /> <br />Parking & Pedestrian Action Plan <br /> <br />Russ discussed the tentative agenda. <br />Planning Commission Comments <br />Discussion regarding SRU’s and PUD’s resulted in a request to have staff check <br />with the City Attorney if an SRU can be added as a use approval. If needed, the <br />item can come back to the Planning Commission for further discussion and <br />review. <br />Staff Comments <br /> <br />Update – Administrative Approvals <br /> <br /> <br />Update – Jefferson Place Subdivision Survey <br /> <br /> <br />Recusal clarification and discussion <br /> <br />Russ reviewed the two update memos regarding the administrative approvals. <br />McCartney briefly reviewed the Jefferson Place Subdivision Survey. The purpose <br />of the survey is to determine is the subdivision could be eligible for Historic <br />th <br />Landmarking as a District. A public hearing will be held on December 13 with <br />the HPC. The survey is an architectural review and not lot line survey. <br />Russ discussed the 500’ notification and how a PC member who receives the <br />notification should handle their involvement of the review of the project. He <br />advised the commissioners they should note receiving the notice and then state <br />why or why not they are recusing themselves from the public hearing. <br />Lipton commended O’Connell for her professionalism and how she has handled <br />the Emergency Siren issue and her personal involvement. <br />Discussion Items for Next Regular Meeting December 9, 2010 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.