My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 01 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2011 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 01 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:15 PM
Creation date
2/8/2011 1:15:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2011 01 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 2010 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Longo answered the field work will be done in approximately 3 weeks but the historical <br />research will take longer. <br />Lewis asked if Lingo was using the original survey forms done in 2000. <br />Lingo answered in the affirmative. <br />Muckle asked if a period of significance has been established. <br />Lingo answered it has not been determined. The default answer is 50 years ago, but <br />that won’t bethe final time frame established. <br />Muckle asked if the information would be GIS compatible. <br />Lingo stated it would be GIS compatible. She has been working with Susan Dellinger, <br />City of Louisville GIS coordinator. <br />Stewart asked if Lingo has included the historic building rating system definitions from <br />page 51 of the Downtown Handbook. <br />Lingo answered in the affirmative. <br />Lewis asked if Lingo believed the state would use Bacon’s social history research. <br />Lingo answered they are very interested in the social history and would use the <br />information. <br />Stewart asked Lingo’s opinion on the benefits of being designated by the state as an <br />historic district. <br />Lingo answered tax credits are the greatest benefit. <br /> – <br />Public Comments <br />Janice Hoffman, 1131 Jefferson Avenue, asked what established the boundary for the <br />survey. <br />Lingo answered it was the boundary of Jefferson Place Subdivision. <br />Pre-filing Conference – 728 Grant Avenue – Rear Addition <br />McCartney reviewed the memo included in the packet. <br />Cameron Weise, applicant, presented his proposal for an addition. He was seeking <br />guidance in whether the addition could be done if he were to landmark his residence. <br />Poppitz stated the project appeared to be a prime example of a sensitive rear addition. <br />Weiseasked what would happen if the rear windows were changed. <br />Lewis answered he might be able to slightly modify the windows in the rear and not lose <br />integrity. <br />McCartney spoke about having a roof pitch less than 6:12. <br />Koertje stated the HPC is in favor of providing design assistance for this project. <br />Lewis stated she would help the owner with design assistance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.