My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 01 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2011 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 01 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:15 PM
Creation date
2/8/2011 1:15:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2011 01 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />Muckle stated she believed landscaping around a landmarked structure should be <br />reviewed on a case by case basis. <br />Lewis stated she didnot want the Old Town District to become an HOA. She does not <br />believe landscaping should be a reviewable element for a landmark. <br />McCartney added landscaping does not require a building permit. Commercial <br />landscaping is the only landscaping reviewed by staff. Residential landscaping is not. <br />Koertje stated he agrees with Lewis in that the regulatory language speaks towards <br />landmarking specific elements and not the entire site unless the landmark specifically <br />establishes landmarking the property. <br />Stewart inquired how additions, which are less than 50 years old, should be handled. <br />Should these additions be required to have an alteration certificate? <br />Koertje recommended the HPC put more thought into this item and bring it back to <br />another meeting. He also recommended a study session. <br />Update/Discussion/Action – Dormant Demolition Permits <br />Koertje asked staff to bring back a clarification from the City Attorney regarding the <br />issue of building permit expiration dates. <br />Committee Reports - none <br />Update on DemolitionRequests – Grain Elevator <br />McCartney gave abriefupdate on the Historic Structure Assessment for the Grain <br />Elevator. <br />Discussion/Comments on Planning Department Referrals – none <br />Updates – none <br />Items from Staff - none <br />Items from Commission Members - none <br />Discussion Items for Next Meeting, January 10, 2011 <br />Grain Elevator HSA <br />Commercial Incentives – road show dates <br />Plaque Prices – re design <br />Adjourn <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:53PM. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.