Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 01 13

Home Browse Search

Alternative Coverage Availability Exposure Access Views Environment Existing Location • 83% City • 99% Res. No conflicts a 200' clear • Except Park /Trail Accessible • 6 Mtn. • 4 Other None HOA Option #1 • 83% City • 99% Res. Utility conflicts • 200' clear • Except Park /Trail Improvements needed • 4 Mtn. • 4 Other • Unstable soils • Tree impacts HOA Option #2 • 83% City • 99% Res. Utility conflicts • 200' clear . Except Park Improvements needed • 3 Mtn. • 4 Other • Unstable soils • Tree impacts Potential Location Option #3 • 83% City • 99% Res. No conflicts • 200' clear • Except Park /Trail Accessible • 6 Mtn. • 4 Other None Regular Business — Public Hearing Items: ➢ Resolution No. 25, Series 2010 — Emergency Siren Location — A public hearing to consider City Staff's comprehensive review of possible locations for an audible outdoor warning system (emergency siren equipment) and to recommend to the Louisville City Council whether or not to approve and ratify the current placement of such a system at the City of Louisville North Water Treatment Plant, 1955 Washington Ave. Case No. 10- 023 -UR. (Continued from October 21, 2010) • Applicant: City of Louisville, Public Safety Department • Representative: Troy Russ, Director of Planning and Building Safety and Bruce Goodman, Chief of Police • Owner: City of Louisville • Case Manager: Troy Russ, Director of Planning and Building Safety Public Notice Certification: This was a continued business item; therefore no additional kc notice was required. Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: Per the City of Louisville Code of Ethics, •nnell recused herself and left Council Chambers. (Note: (added by staff) • . nell is the chair person of the Mesa Village HOA and her home is one of tho pacted by the current location of the siren.) She also read a letter dated Novem•er 16, 2010 regarding an email sent as reply to an email received from City nager, Malcolm Fleming, dated November 11, 2010. Pritchard moved and • • • nded a motion to enter the O'Connell letter into public record. Motion p • •ice vote. Lipton, Loo and Brauneis stated they had visited the site. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Russ reminded the Commission the busin s item is a continuation from the October 14, 2010 pu • . ring. -• r ed with the review of the project description and project • iew. Ru ovided the fNlowing mary of the reevaluation: Purpose and Need easures of Success � & native Locations: orth Water Treatment — existing location ➢ • h Water Treatment — HOA Option #1 ➢ • h Water Treatment — HOA Option #2 ➢ Potential Location — Option #3 The following table provides the detailed alternative analysis. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 18, 2010 Page 2 of 10