My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 02 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 02 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
2/17/2011 1:58:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2011 02 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zalinski stated the contract is with BVSD and they could pull the contract <br />because of the close proximity to the medical marijuana business. <br />Lipton asked Russ if one CB area could be removed from the possible list of <br />sites. Russ stated there could be regulatory language added to prohibit the use in <br />an area. <br />Russell asked Zalinski if she is licensed as a special health care provided. <br />Zalinski stated she is licensed as a business in the city. <br />Lottie Grimes, 10433 Dillon Rd stated she is a nationally ied counselor with <br />troubled children and they work with children with subs abuse problems. <br />She expressed her concerns with the potential location site at the corner of 104 <br />and Dillon Rd. <br />Lipton aske <br />Russ r <br />Lo <br />facili <br />Russ sta <br />Loo stated i <br />why not includ <br />uestions: <br />ed for a cla <br />an approved PUD. <br />Comments <br />Russell asked if ther <br />Dillon Rd. <br />McMillan stated no development but ther <br />cation <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 Chokecherry, stated t ity would not lose much if the <br />CB area at 104 and Dillon was removed fr• e potential site to tion. He also <br />stated the ordinances are overly restricti e city is already exp ncing a <br />high vacancy rate and fewer restrictions • d allow for additional to ns. He <br />recommended the City consider revisiting t ••ic in 18 months for an <br />evaluation of how the regulations are working • of working. <br />Linda Paulino, discussed her association with the Mustang Center and what she <br />feels are the potential impacts to the Cente <br />e marijuana is a drug and needs to be restricted. <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13, 2011 <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />devel• `on the pr operty located at 104 and <br />what the surrounding land us .s are for the CB zone sites. <br />B zone districts and the surrounding property uses. <br />he rules and regulations for schools and daycare <br />dea is to` keep the dispensaries away from these areas then <br />sites that offer classes but are not registered as schools. <br />Sheets asked abo eeping it away from the movie theater. <br />Russell stated he has no concerns with the close proximity to the movie theater. <br />He attends the theater regularly and had no idea there were two dispensaries <br />close to it. <br />Lipton stated his concern with the CB zone district at Dillon and 104 He would <br />like to see it restricted. <br />Sheets asked why the CB was included and not other districts where we have <br />vacancies. The existing uses could be grandfathered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.