Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 18, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br /> <br />Eric Tussey stated he likes the project and thinks it is an improvement of what is <br />currently onsite. <br />Jessica Fasick stated she liked the project but didn’t believe it would comply with <br />landmark criteria. <br />Koertje stated he would work with staff to determine the process and procedure. <br />Blanchard stated the potential stay, on the future partial demolition request, is the most <br />important aspect of project, more so than landmarking. He asked HPC if they liked the <br />project. <br />Koertje stated the HPC liked the concept, but wasn’t sure about the cut out. <br />Muckle asked if the applicant had checked for original tin. <br />Blanchard said he had but would be willing to check again. <br />Lewis recommended landmarking so the HPC could review façade and make further <br />recommendations. <br />Stewart returned when discussion of 817 Main Street ceased. <br />Update/Discussion/Action – Demolition Definition – Amendment to LMC <br />McCartney presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. He stated staff <br />(McCartney and Troy Russ, Director of Planning and Building Safety) had met with <br />Heather Lewis and Peter Stewart to discuss demolition review when windows, doors <br />and other architectural features were involved. <br />Lewis added the discussion focused on creating an expedited review process for those <br />architectural features and stated the group did not believe a social review is necessary <br />for these elements. <br />Koertje asked if old photos would be necessary. <br />McCartney stated staff could provide those from the Carnegie Library files. <br />Koertje also stated a concern about requiring an architect or planner on each <br />subcommittee because it might make a lot of work if we only have one professional staff <br />members. <br />Tofte stated she appreciates the involvement of staff because they can provide the <br />design professional aspect during the review.. <br />Stewart stated review of newer materials (including windows and doors) would not even <br />require a subcommittee review. <br />th <br />Lewis stated there is a meeting with the DBA this week (Wednesday, October 20) and <br />HPC’s input would help with DBA discussion. <br />Koertje stated he was fine with the way the process was presented. <br /> <br />