My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 11 15 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2010 11 15 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:24 PM
Creation date
2/28/2011 9:11:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2010 11 15 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 15, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />Lewis asked if Butterworth knew the primary source causing the water damage – poor <br />gutters. <br />Butterworth answered in the affirmative. <br />Tofte asked how old the roof was. <br />Butterworth answered the roof was replaced when it was damaged after the last hail <br />storm. <br />Tofte asked if the gutters were replaced at that time. <br />Butterworth answered no. <br />Tofte asked if a structural engineer reviewed the coal chute. <br />Butterworth stated it was reviewed by her father, who is a structural engineer. <br />Tofte asked if Columbine was the only contractor who bid on this project. <br />Butterworth answered in the affirmative. <br />Tofte stated she would rather have more than one bid. She added the scope of work is <br />not broken down enough. <br />McCartney showed photos of the damage to the various areas of the house. <br />Tofte asked if Butterworth knew where the leak was coming from. <br />Butterworth stated poor drainage. <br />Commission Comments <br />Lewis stated she did not agree on need for multiple bids. She added the application <br />process needs to be improved. There needs to be back up numbers. We want to make <br />sure we don’t just have the lowest bid receiving the project. <br />Tofte stated she agreed with Lewis but she wants to make sure the best qualified <br />person gets the job. She doesn’t want an electrician doing carpentry. <br />Stewart stated all of the work would require a building permit and all contractors are <br />required to carry a contractor’s license. He stated the back up numbers is a good idea. <br />He added the application should always include photos of each element being <br />requested and additional information of what other work the applicant has done on the <br />house. <br />Lewis asked if the commission felt there was enough information to pass onto City <br />Council. <br />John Leary asked to address the commission. He stated he was concerned with staff <br />setting priorities. He added the priorities should be a decision by the commission, not <br />staff. <br />Koertje stated there needs to be more work on the process, but the applicant should not <br />be held up because of the process. He added the application as good. He also stated <br />the exterior paint could comply with the $5,000 incentive grant, but the owner would <br />need to cover the remainder of the cost. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.