Laserfiche WebLink
Economic Vitality Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 21, 2024 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Public Comment from Judi Kern: Councilmember Kern asked whether the <br />wages are skewed by executive -level wages. Manager Zarate responded that <br />wages are generally qualified through the state. <br />Councilmember Bierman asked for clarification around the property used in <br />space flight. Manager Zarate responded that while all of the targeted industries <br />would be eligible for the enhanced assistance, not all targeted industries would <br />pay taxes on property used in space flight. This would likely be specific to the <br />Aerospace industry. <br />Councilmember Fahey commented that she would like to see hospitals also be <br />eligible for enhanced assistance. Chair Dickinson asked if adding healthcare to <br />the targeted industries list would accomplish this. Director Zuccaro responded <br />that staff will look into adding healthcare to the list. He added that hospitals are <br />often nonprofits and would be exempt from construction use taxes. <br />Chair Dickinson wondered about the impact of bringing in a new business if the <br />City is going to rebate all or most of the tax revenue received from that <br />businesses. Manager Zarate responded that all taxes received from a new <br />business would be new revenue to the City. She also added that the rebates do <br />not last in perpetuity and are generally performance -based. She noted that all <br />rebates also include a cap on the amount of total revenue received by the <br />business. She concluded that new or increased jobs in the City will generally <br />result in new sales tax revenue to the City. <br />Chair Dickinson asked what other revenues besides sales tax the City could <br />receive from a new company coming to Louisville. Manager Zarate responded <br />that the City would receive revenue from building permit fees, signage fees, <br />construction use taxes, and consumer use taxes. She iterated that rebates on <br />construction use taxes would not change under the proposed BAP Amendment. <br />Chair Dickinson asked if machinery, machinery tools, software and property <br />used in space flight are currently captured under the existing BAP program. <br />Manager Zarate responded that these components are not currently rebated in <br />the existing BAP program, but noted that they are rebated by some competitors. <br />Councilmember Bierman commented that he liked the fact that the amendment <br />allows for up to a 100% rebate and noted that there could be times when staff <br />recommends less than a 100% rebate. Councilmember Fahey agreed with this <br />statement. <br />Public Comment from Judi Kern: Councilmember Kern noted that expenses <br />may not be a one-time occurrence and asked whether there's a way for future <br />expenses to be rebated. Manager Zarate responded that a business could <br />potentially amend their amendment if they are within the rebate timeline. <br />Director Zuccaro added that if a company is outside their rebate timeline and <br />