My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 07 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2024 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 07 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2024 9:36:21 AM
Creation date
8/28/2024 9:14:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
7/10/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
8/28/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />June 12, 2024 <br />Page 2of6 <br />Charles asked about the status of the grading permit. Ember noted that there is no approved <br />grading permit yet. Open Space staff are meeting with other city staff to ask questions about <br />the grading process based on citizen comments and has shared the public comments with all <br />the staff involved in the decision to issue the permit. Susan asked that the results of the staff <br />meeting be shared with OSAB if allowed. <br />Michiko asked why we have not yet seen a clear map of the area to be graded. Ember: Open <br />space staff are also asking for a clear grading plan that shows the areas to be graded. The City <br />should have this plan soon. <br />General concern from OSAB members about the timing of the grading permit process, since it is <br />proceeding without OSAB input. Susan will draft an email from OSAB to relevant city staff to <br />share concerns about the lack of OSAB input. <br />David noted that there is sometimes divergence between planning staff and OSAB, citing the <br />previous conversations about trails at Redtail Ridge. He has concerns about how OSAB <br />concerns are incorporated in staff reviews and wants to ensure that OSAB feedback is <br />effectively represented to Council. He also noted that OSAB has only been asked to review <br />trails on RTR, but there are several other issues at the site that could be in OSAB purview, <br />particularly wildlife. <br />Andy — concerns about how the current proposed review process (which, based on the planning <br />department's memo is that OSAB provides comments to the planner) is at odds with the <br />proposed changes to city code about the OSAB quasi-judicial status, which suggests that OSAB <br />communicates directly to council. Ember will send out an email to get questions about the <br />quasi-judicial process from the board so that she can forward it to the city manager and <br />planning department and ensure they can address them at the next meeting. <br />6. 7:10 pm Staff Updates (5 Minutes) <br />The Open Space department filled the trail & maintenance technician and open space manager <br />positions. Both are very well qualified. Manager starting in August. <br />Regarding grazing, finished successful goats and cattle grazing for this spring. There is good <br />data on the impact of grazing on fuels reduction. Cattle will be back in fall, but goats will not be <br />back until next year. Susan suggested we consider additional educational signage for next <br />year. Ember noted that the reaction to goats at Dutch Creek this year was not as positive as it <br />was at the North Open Space last year. Staff are thinking about a different communication plan, <br />including signage, for next year to better explain the rationale and benefits of goat grazing. <br />City of Louisville <br />Parks Division 749 Main Street Louisville CO 80027 <br />303.335.4774 (phone) www.LouisvilleCO.gov <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.