Laserfiche WebLink
zr1 Nm""arrf�w��rmu.a�— <br />WOOD CCU.. <br />iL.+GG EE. CODE t <br />TO NEW UPPER LEVEL 5. <br />aMµN�3P0�ui3 <br />AHMGSHINGLE <br />/ <br />Existing elevation (top left) with proposed street -facing elevations and renderings (bottom). <br />REVIEW CRITERIA: <br />The Board of Adjustment has authority to grant or deny a variance request based on the <br />review criteria found in LMC Sec. 17.48.110. The following are staff's analysis of the criteria <br />with recommended findings on each. In reviewing an application, the Board must find that <br />all six variance criteria have been met. <br />1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as irregularity, <br />narrowness or shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or other physical <br />conditions peculiar to the affected property. <br />The subject property has an existing garage from the 1960s or earlier that was placed closer <br />to Main Street than current zoning allows. There are a number of these types of properties <br />in the surrounding area: corner lots with alley access that have older, street -facing garages <br />that do not meet setbacks. However, the affected property has a unique jog in the street to <br />the east of the garage that creates the effect of the garage being farther from the street than <br />the other properties with similar garage placements. Staff finds the proposal meets this <br />criterion. <br />4 <br />