Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes - Page 2 <br />September 20, 1979 <br /> <br />DiCarlo: <br /> <br />May I make a comment? I have talked about this with the <br />various neighbors of mine: Mrs. Kaprowski behind me, Mr. <br />Garnier before he left for vacation, Mrs. Mathis next door, <br />and they have no objection to the location of the garage <br />when it's buil t. <br /> <br />Ross: <br /> <br />Okay, thank you. Comments by Board members. Don? <br /> <br />Pickett: <br /> <br />I move we grant Mr. DiCarlo the variance. <br /> <br />Ross: <br /> <br />There is an intended motion that we- <br /> <br />Davies: <br /> <br />No, you cannot have a motion until other hands have had a <br />chance to speak. I think the motion is out of order until <br />after that has been done. <br /> <br />Ross: <br /> <br />Okay, comments by the Board. <br /> <br />Davies: <br /> <br />This is Bob Davies. One thing I want to get settled in my <br />mind. This variance, that it being for a total of five feet <br />has something in common with a new structure on top of the <br />hill at Mesa Point. And I'm wondering if this is proper <br />to deny one and grant the other. <br /> <br />What application are you referring to? <br /> <br />Davies: <br /> <br />The one on Mesa Point. If you will allow me. "Si.nce we've <br />defined West Hawthorn, Mesa Point, Route #429, on the <br />requested set back that the new building could be changed <br />to 21 feet instead of 25 feet from the property line." <br /> <br />DiCarlo: <br /> <br />Chairman, may I ask Mr. Davies a question? Was that a front <br />or rear yard set back? <br /> <br />DiCarlo: <br /> <br />Rear yard. <br /> <br />Was that a front or a rear yard set back? I think that was <br />a front yard set back. <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />Ferris: <br /> <br />That was a rear yard set back. <br /> <br />DiCarlo: <br /> <br />I stand corrected. <br /> <br />Is there no further questions? <br /> <br />Davies: <br /> <br />Not at the moment. <br /> <br />Reed: <br /> <br />I would also like to make the similar comment basically <br />from the standpoint that it's almost a hypocritical type <br />situation here. I feet that we had a presentation that <br />evening for basically almost exactly the same thing except <br />that it had already been completed to a certain extent <br />with the foundations in? and the floor system in and <br />