My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2024 10 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2024 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2024 10 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2024 3:24:49 PM
Creation date
10/10/2024 3:13:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/17/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 24, 2024 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />projects listed which are not funded and the committee and council can determine their priorities. <br />Councilmember Kern commented that bouncing between 8-9 different attachments is complicated and <br />very difficult for the community to keep track of this and she was hoping that she could get something <br />that demonstrated that we have additional requests coming before council that, based on our EDI <br />initiatives, we should definitively be saying yes to for current residents that need assistance instead of <br />future 5-10 year down the road projects. She asked for an easy -to -read list of what is not getting funded <br />or projects that can get scaled back versus eliminating projects. The Director of Finance directed the <br />committee to the unfunded project slides. <br />The Interim City Manager commented that staff has been asked in the course of this conversation to add <br />funds to the budget, such as around Via Appia, and after hearing what the Finance Director has said about <br />the tightness of the CIP budget that added funding will have to come from somewhere and her question <br />to the committee is if they have a recommendation as to where that comes from and is this an area they <br />are recommending. <br />Councilmember Hoefner responded that he has other areas as well and feels that for the purposes of this <br />meeting everything is up for discussion. Councilmember Kern agreed and added that it's up for a full <br />conversation and that there are several things on here, in order to maintain pedestrian safety, we need to <br />take this seriously and our community is demanding we address it, noting that, if a long-range project <br />needs to be reduced or eliminated, she is in favor of that. <br />Councilmember Dickinson commented that Affordable Housing is interesting one because, similar to other <br />projects, it's the kind of one where if we put $2M towards a project we could get additional funding from <br />other sources — it's the money that gets you money. Whereas there are a lot of things we pay for that <br />aren't grant eligible and the problems we have now are that other communities are receiving affordable <br />housing grants, and we are leaving millions of dollars on the table because we aren't in the game. <br />Councilmember Dickinson feels this is a key priority for 2025 and that the committee should use the work <br />plan for prioritization of CIP projects. <br />Councilmember Hamlington made a comment with reference to the City Manager's recommendation in <br />Tight of this particular topic, noting that the committee already touched on item 35 and how that number <br />will change as the scope of that project has changed as well as item 34 and she is assuming this came <br />from Parks. She asked if those two items are mission critical right now or could those two items close the <br />gap for adding the Via Appia improvements back into the budget while maintaining the integrity of the <br />Affordable Housing line item. The Director of Finance responded that the sports complex restrooms, #35 <br />will be revised down to $200,000; the $650,000 for the new concession is not in the current forecast so <br />that there is $200,000 for the restroom renovations and $350,000 for the parking lot improvements. The <br />Director of PROS pointed out that the $350,000 for the parking lots is budgeted in 2028, noting that the <br />parking lot is in pretty bad shape and repair in 2028 will be a stretch. We place a high level of value to <br />upgrading that amenity when we are able to due to the reflection it gives to visitors from outside of <br />Louisville. The restrooms are in a pretty dire state and we would like to align the restroom experience with <br />the pristine field experience. $200,000 was scaled back from a best guess from the facilities director to <br />lower the budget amount. Councilmember Hamlington asked if we make money from the rental of the <br />fields to cover the costs of maintenance. The Director of PROS responded that yes, we do receive revenues <br />14/87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.