Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 24, 2024 <br />Page 8 of 8 <br />let's continue this conversation to see what Capital Projects could help supplement that delta if needed, <br />knowing that the rec fund is balanced, and we don't need to dive into that right now. <br />Councilmember Hoefner is inclined to remove converting volleyball to pickleball and focus on converting <br />the inline to pickleball and see how it goes before converting anything else to pickleball. Councilmember <br />Kern commented that she does see people use volleyball courts and she agreed with Councilmember <br />Hoefner's comments. The Director of PROS responded that the reason a lot of these items are in the out <br />years give credibility to the long-range planning process that we will go through next year. The volleyball <br />conversion is a placeholder as an assumption for what community feedback will be in the master planning <br />process. The same applies to the trail master plan occurring next year. There's no point in dragging down <br />budgets with things that will change in the future. Councilmember Hoefner asked about the baseball field. <br />The Director of PROS responded that the two baseball fields we currently have high demand considering <br />additional use and are running into a situation in one or two budget cycles for repairs of the ball fields. <br />This is a placeholder to consider repurposing that space. We can remove and reconsider during a future <br />budget cycle with the understanding that it's a placeholder. <br />Councilmember Fahey commented that there is a question about soccer fields/multipurpose fields and a <br />question about getting Lafayette to install the fields on the east side of Highway 42. She asked if there is <br />any way we can encourage that activity? The Director of PROS responded that this would be driven by <br />Council and the CMO. It's on the record at the RAB meeting that we met with the leadership of Lafayette <br />regarding that IGA and that parcel of land, and they did not have that development in any of their current <br />long-range development budgets. Councilmember Kern asked if including that property, the feasibility <br />study might encourage Lafayette to move forward. The Director of PROS responded that he envisions the <br />long-range plan would do that. Councilmember Hoefner commented that he thinks he is hearing support <br />for pulling some of these items out pending completion of the overall master planning process and to <br />readjust as a result. The committee agreed. <br />Councilmember Hoefner had a question about the cemetery long range plan. The Director of PROS <br />responded that it is a placeholder for the long-range plan based on comparing against similarly sized <br />cemeteries in the area and consulting costs. We don't have a plan to manage the cemetery with lots and <br />what plots are available. Councilmember Hoefner supports the project for less cost. <br />Public Comments: None. <br />Closing Questions/Comments from the Committee: None <br />Councilmember Kern motioned to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Hamlington seconded. <br />Adjourn: The meeting adjourned at 7:24 PM <br />17/87 <br />