Board of Adjustment Documents 1990

Home Browse Search

Smith stated lf t';e applll;.3nt '..:oul,~ :.1"-:[.' tu bl~ild sOmF:'~iil:lg .C the y w 0 u 1 d h a vet 0 com e b a c :.: t () the v 3 ~ .:. Cl. !1 C r::- :.:: 0 a t'd for a p r t j "13. _ 3. n d t his s h 0 u 1 d be f lag g e J at t !-: e t 1m '0' c ~ ~'c 1..11 ['I 9 .:? e t' m.:.. t . Franklin stated that a in the building permit copy fi 1 e of the paper '""ad: Lefecenc,,,::. w 0 u 1 d be i n C" 1 u d "".:; J: .,L_ ~) :... Sears asked if handrails would be put i~. Haltrunft stated no. We are only talking about 18 inches. Sears asked how big the redwood deck 1, '" ':" ..J . H art ran f t ::; tat e d i tis a b 0 utI 0 fee t 0 uta n d 3 fee t .J V e r. l\. b u u : 150 square feet. Sear~ asked when there is a road to the side of the a lot what ~S the ;~etback'? Woad stated the sideyard ~etback to the street lS 30 feet from the publ1c rlght of way, but this i:J ,l private one. Sears asked if this was replatted? original Continental Vi'ew. Was it a replat of the :1:artronft :.:;tated Uns was never part of Contlnental View. This was a new annexation and subdivislon not a replat. Smith moved to grant the variance for the backyard setback to fifteen feet from the 25 foot requirement for uncovered redwood de'::k and to l:'1clude no more than the proposed envelope 150 Sql-,a!.~ feet.:l:., and the height to be no more than 18 inches not irlC: Idl:19 the benc~ that is proposed, seconded by Fyne. By Roll Call VGt~ motion passed 5-0. Sears stated he had a concern with the fact that no alternatioL was made to the house for the roof and the deck. I do have a problem wit~ the lot and the size of the house that lS on It, Lt doesn't go along with rest of the neighborhood. My maJOt' (joJecLon is that this just doesn't fit in. Smi th moved to approve the variance for an increase of .59% on the lot coverage which will include the rear deck and the covered steps, seconded by Fyne. Smith stated that the lot coverage is already there with the wall being there, so the addition of a roof is just going to be 3- hcL:'dshlP fOL the owner. If the neighbors are willing to live with the additional cover, by not passing this we are only hurt- ll1g the ownelS. Sears felt that the board should have looked at this issue sooner than they have.