Board of Adjustment Documents 1990

Home Browse Search

Sears asked what the rear yard setback will be? Oshiro stated it will be 39 feet. STAFF PRESENTATION/RECOMMENDATION: Wood referred to the staff report of June 28, 1990. Staff does reco~nend approval of both variances as requested. Sears asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this proposal? Alice Hourly 1001 Lincoln Ave. Louisville, Colorado. Hourly stated what she would like to request from the board that a pr i vacy fence be installed between the two properties. This would give us the privacy and a little bit of sound barrier from the back yards. Ross stated part of that area was the coal mining camps at one time. I really believe that the property line on those two lots was taken from the base point on Walnut Street as far as the plat was concerned. I think if a privacy fence wouldn't be way out of line, it would have to met requirements by the code, then I think that would work. Oshiro asked who would have to be responsible for taking out the permi t for the fence I sur vey ing the proper ty, taking out the existing fence and paying for the permit for the new fence. Wood statpd if it was condition by the board it would be responsibility as the applicant as part of the variance. is not a condition of approval then you would be free to with your neighbor to share those costs. )ur It it work Wood stated if approved the total living area would be about 780 square feet and the approximate lot coverage would be about 25%. Sears asked what percentage of building coverage is allowed in R- L? Wood stated that is 30%. Sears closed the public hearing. BOARD COMMENTS: Swires stated that he felt the issue with the fence should be worked out between the applicant and the neighbor. I would just as soon not make it part of our proposal and let them work it out about the fence. Sears felt the issue about the fence should be taken into consideration.