Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 10 10

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 11, 2024 Page 3 of 6 Mihaly said that he was in support, and noted that it would not have an impact on the neighborhood. Moline said that he was in support. Motion to approve Resolution 7, Series 2024 was moved by Choi and seconded by Mihaly. The motion was adopted by a vote of 5 to 0. b) Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Final Plat — 421 and 533 East Street: Consideration of Resolution 8, Series 2024, regarding a recommendation to City Council for a final PUD and final plat to allow 21 townhomes and 15 single family homes at 421 and 533 East Street. Staff Presentation: Post introduced the presentation for the final plat, PUD and easement vacation. He noted that there had not been any significant changes between the preliminary and final PUD processes. He covered requested waivers, and explained why staff felt that they were reasonable. He also outlined proposed design and layout of the development. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended approval of Resolution 8, Series 2024. Commissioner Questions of Staff. Mihaly asked what pedestrian access would look like, and whether there would be a standard width sidewalk on East St. Post said that at least a 5 foot wide side walk was planned, though it could be up to 6 feet wide. Mihaly asked whether access to downtown would be dependent on walking down East and Pine Streets. Post said yes. Hunt asked to confirm that there not be any egress to the west side of the development due to the BNSF railway. Post confirmed this. Mihaly said that his main concerns were around pedestrian access to the site, particularly from downtown and to nearby parks and open space. Hunt asked whether the proposal would be similar to the existing Clementine and Sunnyside developments. Post said yes. Choi asked if staff could highlight the changes from the preliminary plat and PUD. Post said that the changes were largely to the single family homes, specifically the arrangement of type 1 versus type 2 designs for said homes. He deferred to the applicant on the proposed changes to the fencing.