Laserfiche WebLink
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Agenda <br />September 25, 2024 <br />Page 4 of 56 <br />home where interior lithium batteries are on fire, except for an initial search, due <br />to the toxicity of the materials that burn from lithium storage. By keeping lithium <br />storage on the exterior of the building envelope, the fire department can attempt <br />to control the burn and keep it from spreading. <br />Root: If lithium batteries catch on fire inside the home, the home will need to be <br />gutted due to the toxic buildup from the materials, if the home is still standing. <br />This requirement was included in the Home Hardening Code proposal since it <br />relates to the fire department's ability to keep the fire from spreading from one <br />structure to the adjoining property. <br />Berry explained that the term "hardening" refers to a flame and ignition starting <br />from outside the home and that the lithium battery restriction would refer to a fire <br />started inside the home which should be addressed through fire "rating" rather <br />than home hardening. <br />In response to Gatto's comment that this should not be in the Home Hardening <br />Code and belongs in the Building Code, Henderson explained that by having <br />this item in the Home Hardening Code, they are trying to create a space currently <br />to prevent lithium batteries (e-scooter batteries, solar batteries, and other lithium <br />batteries) from being stored inside the home because there are no other <br />restrictions at the moment. <br />Henderson confirmed that this requirement is part of the 2024 code, and if the <br />2024 code is adopted by the City, it would be addressed with that code. <br />Berry questioned if this requirement could be added as an amendment to the <br />current code. Root explained that since the Home Hardening Code is currently <br />being reviewed it made sense to include it with this proposal. <br />Berry states that the "hardening" code prevents or stalls the ignition of a home, <br />whereas the ability to safely exit a home on fire is part of the building code, and <br />that the lithium requirement should be part of the building code. <br />Dino also expressed concern that by requiring these batteries to be outside the <br />home, if there were only a few companies that make these batteries capable of <br />installation on the outside, we could be supporting a monopoly. <br />