My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 02 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2025 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 02 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 8:26:13 AM
Creation date
3/26/2025 4:33:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/12/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />January 22, 2025 <br />Page 6of8 <br />Councilmember Dickinson made a motion to approve the formation of a Downtown Vision Plan <br />Advisory Committee at the discretion of staff to provide input on the project. Commissioner Tofte <br />seconded the motion. Motion passed. <br />Commissioner Comments: <br />The Attorney to the LRC informed the LRC that the RFP cannot be discussed at this meeting <br />because it was not included in the posted meeting agenda. <br />There was a discussion about naming agenda items to allow discussion at commission <br />meetings. <br />There was extensive discussion around the proposed steering committee, its role and <br />responsibilities, how often it needs to meet, and its composition. Commissioner Lipton <br />requested documentation on the roles and responsibilities this committee would have. <br />There was also a discussion around the benefits and possible challenges of having a steering <br />committee on the project. <br />Councilmember Dickinson suggested there need not be an LRC representative on the <br />committee because staff will be able to collect input from the committee and bring input received <br />and recommendations to the LRC to consider. <br />Commissioner Iglesias commented that a body is needed to provide consolidated input which <br />will go through the approving authorities. <br />Commissioner Williams commented that she would like to see the committee set up as an <br />advisory council rather than a steering committee to avoid the impression of a higher level of <br />authority. <br />Chair Adler read comments provided by Commissioner Harald. He expressed concern about <br />complications that might arise with a steering committee and noted that he wrote a letter to <br />council expressing his concerns. <br />Chair Adler agreed with Commissioner Williams, suggesting this committee be an advisory <br />group and being very clear as to their purpose in advising the LRC so that the LRC can advise <br />the council. <br />The Director of Public Works commented that a committee is the most streamlined way to <br />receive input from the greatest number of people in the community. <br />Chair Adler proposed this move forward as staff has proposed, commenting that decisions on <br />where the money is spent should go through LRC. <br />Commissioner Lipton commented that he is fine with an advisory or stakeholder committee and <br />letting staff figure out what they need from that, who they need at the table, and when to get <br />advice from stakeholders to shape the plan and then bring the input to LRC with <br />recommendations. He added that the LRC will make recommendations to Council for approval, <br />noting that the LRC doesn't need to micromanage how staff gets information to make <br />recommendations. <br />Agenda Packet P. 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.