My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2025 04 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2025 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2025 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2025 10:28:20 AM
Creation date
4/24/2025 10:23:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/17/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 20, 2025 <br />Page 3of6 <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked for clarification on the amount of time it takes to submit a check request. <br />The Director of Finance described the check request process. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked for clarification on what a "rush" request is. The Interim Accounting <br />Supervisor described reasons for rush check requests. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked if there is anything Council could actively do about bills on the warrant <br />list. The Interim Accounting Manager described how councilmembers could have items pulled prior to <br />payment. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked which of the benefits listed in the proposed procedural changes would <br />contribute most to cost savings. The Director of Finance responded that check requests require a lot of <br />administrative time. Also, the bi-weekly check runs create a larger burden on finance staff than having a <br />regular weekly check run. The City Manager commented that staff hear from vendors regularly about the <br />timeliness of payments due to the current process. <br />Councilmember Hamlington commented that this change needs to be communicated to the community so <br />any residents who track this process will know where to look for them. <br />Councilmember Hoefner requested that staff send an email to council when warrant batches are posted <br />as part of the new processes. <br />Councilmember Cooperman asked if this change requires an ordinance by Council. The Director of Finance <br />responded that council approval is not required, and the Finance Department will take the Committee's <br />suggestions on communications and implement them as part of the procedural improvement. <br />Public Comments: <br />Councilmember Kern agreed with Councilmember Hamlington's comment to ensure communication. She <br />expressed support for this procedural improvement. <br />Marshall Fire Plan Review and Permit Fee Options: <br />The Interim City Manager presented the Marshall Fire Plan Review and Permit Fee Options to the <br />committee. The presentation was included in the meeting packet. <br />Staff requested guidance from the Committee on whether to pursue 3rd party reconciliation and if the <br />committee would like to pursue a rebate/refund. If the committee would like to pursue a rebate/refund, <br />staff requested guidance on the eligibility criteria. <br />The Committee asked staff to determine what the rough estimate looks like and bring it back to Finance <br />Committee at a future meeting. Councilmember Hoefner commented that this is important, but there's not <br />a particular rush to get it on the next meeting agenda. <br />5/69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.