My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 09 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2025 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 09 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2025 1:43:27 PM
Creation date
9/18/2025 1:27:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/15/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 24, 2025 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />Commissioner Discussion: <br />Haley thought that the staff review prior to the awarding of the grant was really important, <br />and agreed that they should consider updating the requirements. <br />Zuccaro noted that the staff review was only surface level, and that they were not <br />positioned to identify whether specific aspects were missing details, for example. <br />Haley suggested that they could produce some sample HSAs to use as a template. <br />Zuccaro said that staff wanted to send out all of the completed HSAs to Commissioners, <br />and noted that they had not been seeing a big range in quality in the completed HSAs. <br />The consensus amongst Commissioners was that proposed amounts were appropriate, <br />and that the other requirements were good. On the extraordinary circumstances, <br />Commissioners generally felt that there were very few buildings in Louisville to which it <br />could be applied, so they did not feel it would be overused. They also agreed that there <br />should not be a requirement for two bids, as this would be too difficult and onerous for <br />applicants to obtain. <br />Motion to recommend the proposed changes to Council with the language on the two bids <br />removed was moved by Burg, and seconded by Beauchamp. The motion was adopted <br />byavote of7to0. <br />b) May Landmark Ceremony Date <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Cline -Gibson introduced the presentation on the landmarking ceremony. She said that <br />the discussion tonight was to determine the date for the 2025 ceremony. She covered <br />some previous dates it had been held, and suggested some dates for the 2025 ceremony. <br />Commissioner Discussion: <br />Burg suggested that a date in mid or early may would work best due to the end of the <br />school year at the end of May. <br />Haley suggested that it should be held mid -week. <br />The consensus amongst Commissioners was for it to be held on Wednesday May 14, <br />with the date to be confirmed pending a check for any other conflicts. <br />Items from Staff <br />Cline -Gibson went over the proposed meeting dates for 2025. <br />Updates from Commission Members <br />None were heard. <br />Adjournment <br />Motion to adjourn was moved by Anderson, seconded by Burg, and adopted by voice <br />vote.The Commission adjourned at 8:03pm. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.