Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 14, 2011 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br />None heard. <br />Summary Comments and Request from Staff and/or Applicant <br />No additional comments from either staff or the applicant. <br />Closed Public Hearing – Planning Commission Discussion <br />O’Connell stated her support for the project. <br />Russell stated his support of the project and requested staff to include copies of <br />the comments such as referenced from the Public Works Department with future <br />applications. <br />Loo stated she would like to see more landscaping about the employee break <br />area but she also supports the project as presented. <br />Sheets and Brauneis stated their support of the project. <br />Russell moved and Brauneis seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 15, <br />Series 2011 as presented by staff with the three (3) conditions. <br />Roll Call Vote <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton Excused <br />Chris Pritchard Excused <br />Susan S. Loo Yes <br />Ann O’Connell Yes <br />Monica Sheets Yes <br />Steve Brauneis Yes <br />Scott Russell Yes <br />Motion passed: 5 to 0 <br /> <br />st <br /> Resolution No. 16, Series 2011, Takoda GDP, 1 Amendment <br />, a <br /> <br />request to modify the Takoda General Development Plan (GDP) to <br />include the 5.9 acre property located to the west of Planning Area <br />Four (4) (on the north side of South Boulder road, east of the BNSF <br />rail line). Case No. 11-019-GDP. <br /> <br /> Applicant and Owner: RMCS, LLC <br /> <br /> Representative: Justin McClure, Manager <br /> <br /> Case Manager: Sean McCartney, Principal Planner <br />Public Notice Certification: <br />Published in the Camera on Jun 26, 2011. Posted in City Hall, the Library, the <br />Recreation Center and the Police and Court Building on June 24, 2011. Mailed to <br />surrounding property owners on June 24, 2011. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br /> None heard. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />McCartney reviewed the case the following information: <br /> <br /> <br />