Laserfiche WebLink
Hartronft stated that it has not been established whether it would be a restaurant, retail or <br />office, and those require different traffic counts. <br /> <br />Sisk stated his concern over added traffic with the right-in/right-out configuration. <br /> <br />Hartronft stated that the remaining site is much smaller than the existing site, and that <br />even doubling the 2% would meet the standards. <br /> <br />Howard stated that he had questions relative to the conditions outlined in Planning <br />Commission Resolution No.4. He asked if the applicant had any problem with conditions <br />No. 2, involving cash-in lieu of dedication, 3,4 and 5, involving landscape revisions. <br /> <br />Hartronft stated that they did not have problems with any of the conditions. <br /> <br />Howard asked Tom Phare what Staff's opinion is with respect to the piping of the ditch. <br />He asked if, in the event of problems with the ditch, would piping be a benefit to the City. <br /> <br />Phare stated that the City has no ownership to the easement. He stated that there might <br />have been four or five problem situations in the last five years, which required City <br />intervention. However, the City does not do any scheduled maintenance in the ditch. <br /> <br />Davidson asked the applicant if they had plans to tear down the abandoned house on the <br />property. <br /> <br />The applicant stated that the house would be torn down. <br /> <br />Council Keany arrived at 8:02 p.m. <br /> <br />Davidson asked Phare if the rights of the ditch were junior or senior rights. <br /> <br />Phare stated that the Goodhue Ditch rights on South Boulder Creek are junior water <br />rights. Phare noted that the City of Lafayette also uses the ditch for Waneka Lake. <br /> <br />Davidson asked Phare if the City has ever taken responsibility for piping any other ditch <br />in the City of Louisville. <br /> <br />Phare stated that the City does not pipe ditches that are owned by mutual ditch companies <br />unless it is part of a capital project. <br /> <br />Davidson asked Phare about the proposed easement to the north. He stated that he was <br />concerned about people cutting through the parking lots to gain access to the north. <br /> <br /> Phare stated that the access is essential to get to the north area and with the right layout <br /> the problems can be minimized. Phare stated that Phase II would give opportunities to <br /> look at other solutions. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />