Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Louisville City Council Meeting <br />March 1, 2005 <br />Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />Council member Keany stated the major concern appears to be the involuntary <br />designation of historic property. He asked Chairperson Koertje if the ordinance was <br />presented to other business organizations. Chairperson Koertje stated other than <br />Downtown Business Association, there has not been concern voiced by other groups. He <br />stated owners of historic homes voiced some concern, but seemed to be satisfied by the <br />guidelines set forth in the ordinances. Alicia Mahoney, Former member of the Historic <br />Preservation Commission, stated a presentation was also made to the Chamber of <br />Commerce. <br /> <br />Council member Keany asked Commissioner Hartronft ifhe was aware of other <br />community's preservation ordinances contain involuntary designation. Commissioner <br />Hartronft stated some ordinance address involuntary and some do not. <br /> <br />Council member Keany asked Commissioner Hartronft what he envisioned the City <br />doing with historic property it purchases. Commissioner Hartronft stated the City could <br />preserve the property and then sell it and move on to preserve the next historic property. <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt commended the work of the Historic Preservation <br />Commission. She addressed the incentives for preservation suggested by the <br />Commission and felt they should be defined and provide options for future Council's to <br />contemplate. She voiced her concern over historic designation over a landowner's <br />objection. <br /> <br />Council member Brown concurred with Council member VanPelt and suggested the <br />Council and the community find funding methods to preserve historic properties. He <br />stressed it is a community investment. <br /> <br />Council member Marsella applauded the efforts of the Historic Preservation Commission. <br />She supported landmarking over the objections of the property owner, but felt the <br />guidelines should be very stringent. She suggested it could be used as a negotiation tool. <br />She disagreed with a 50-year benchmark for historic preservation, and suggested 65-years <br />for a starting point. She differed with the Planning Commission and stated the history of <br />Louisville is quite important and worth preserving. <br /> <br />Council member Levihn addressed the old town neighborhood where historic homes have <br />been remodeled or demolished. He requested that Steve Anderson address cataloging of <br />the historic old town community and respond to the remodels of the historic homes in <br />Louisville. Steve Anderson stated many of the homes in Old Town Louisville date back <br />to the teens and early twenties. He stated in cataloging the homes, there should be at least <br />a sixty-year threshold. He noted some communities, such as the City of Boulder, have <br />addressed pop-up remodels and demolition of historic homes by prohibiting them in their <br />ordinances. He noted those type of alterations change the character and flavor of old <br />town Louisville. <br /> <br />6 <br />