City Council Minutes 2000 11 08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting November 8, 2000 Page 9. PUD process. He stated that the developer is committed to work with the neighbors. He also stated that the PUD process is very extensive and quite costly. Spare asked if Council is requesting the entire PUD process, which would include the engineering and plan development, prior to annexation approval. Sisk asked Planning Director Wood what process was available to the applicant. Wood stated that at one time the two processes, annexation and zoning and the PUD were paralleled. Wood stated he had directed the applicant not to go forward with the PUD process until the annexation and zoning had been approved. Wood stated that they could enter into the platting process of the PUD up to the Discussion/Direction process of a Preliminary PUD. Wood noted that through the Planning Commission public heatings the neighbors could review the plan. City Attorney Light concurred that years ago in the past annexation, zoning and PUD'ran concurrently, however he noted that certain issues such as acquisition may be an inappropriate topic for an annexation agreement. Sisk asked Mr. Spare if the applicant would be willing to go through the Preliminary PUD process. Sparn stated that they would be willing to go through the Preliminary PUD process. Howard stated there is new information to review and that he is willing to evaluate the proposal through the Preliminary PUD process. Brown commended the applicant for the significant amount of progress made since the last meeting. He concurred with Councilman Levihn's concerns about an election and noted that it may not be the wisest use of City funds. Brown stressed that the Preliminary PUD process will ensure neighborhood and Planning Commission input. Keany voiced his concern about the timeframe required for the Preliminary PUD. Wood asked City Attorney Light if the City would encounter problems with the statutory one-year rule for enclaves. He noted that the Planning Commission hearing would not be held until February 13, 2001, and Discussion/Direction of the City Council could come prior to that date. City Attorney Light stated that the one-year rule applies only to the annexation .petition. He noted that the original application was filed in May of 2000, and a revised petition filed in July of 2000. Light stated that the one-year rule would not apply until July of 9