My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2012 08 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2012 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2012 08 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:32 PM
Creation date
9/5/2012 2:23:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/21/2012
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2012 08 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> August 21, 2012 <br /> Page 11 of 23 <br /> Ms. Marsella voiced her support of a fifty-year term over the thirty-year term. She <br /> supported a clause, which would revert the properties back to the City in lieu of an <br /> injunction. <br /> Michael Reis, 738 Pear Court, Louisville, CO stated the cash assets are not tied to the <br /> 116 units. He felt the cash could be set up in various foundations to benefit Louisville <br /> residents. He stated Boulder County would just use the funds elsewhere and borrow <br /> against the Louisville housing units for their rehabilitation and for the development of the <br /> additional 15 units. He urged Council to reconsider the agreement. <br /> Jim Brownell, 2561 Lexington Street, Lafayette, CO explained he came to speak about <br /> the grain elevator and wondered when Council would discuss this matter. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> Council member Loo asked if the cash flow is in restrictive funds. Frank Alexander <br /> explained some of the money is in restricted accounts and some in unrestricted <br /> accounts. He stated the total is $661,000 and it is segregated by property. The cash <br /> funds equate to $6,000 per units. <br /> MOTION: Council member Sackett moved to approve Resolution No. 55, Series 2012, <br /> seconded by Council member Loo. <br /> COUNCIL DISCUSSION: Council member Loo commented the objective is to provide <br /> more affordable housing, but felt due diligence was not adequate and therefore would <br /> be voting no. Council member Yamell asked if a longer item should be renegotiated. <br /> Council member Jasiak agreed the goal is to have affordable housing in the City. <br /> City Manager Fleming explained the intent of the IGA's thirty-year requirement was to <br /> enable some flexibility on individual units being identified as the subject of the <br /> restriction. He agreed thirty years did not seem like a long time. One approach would <br /> be to make it in perpetuity or at least fifty years that Boulder County would maintain at <br /> least 146 units. <br /> Terri Abbott, LHA Chairperson explained the thirty-year term was considered because <br /> Boulder County would add their units to the agreement. Frank Alexander stated if <br /> Council wishes, he would take the agreement amendment before the LHA, and the <br /> Boulder County Commissioners. <br /> Mayor Muckle offered a friendly amendment to extend the agreement term from thirty <br /> years to fifty years. Council members Sackett and Loo accepted the friendly <br /> amendment. City Attorney Light stated staff would report back to Council on whether <br /> the change in the term was acceptable to the other parties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.