City Council Minutes 2001 05 15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting May 15, 2001 Page 6 Davidson asked Johnstone why the Open Space Advisory Board did not review this matter in April. Johnstone stated that he did not know the reason. Davidson stated that the applicant is being delayed by the Open Space Advisory Board's review and that he was in favor of going forward with setting the public hearing. MOTION: Keany moved that Council approve Resolution No. 24, Series 2001, seconded by Levihn. City Attorney Light clarified for the record that the Resolution for Substantial Compliance would set a public hearing date for July 3, 2001. VOTE: Roll call vote was taken. The motion passed by a vote of 4-2. Mayer and Brown voted no. RESOLUTION NO. 27, SERIES 2001 - A RESOLUTION OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE - HOYLE ANNEXATON Davidson called for Staff presentation. Principal Planner Johnstone reported that the property owners, the Hoyle Family Trust, have submitted an annexation petition to commence the annexation process with the City of Louisville. The property is approximately 33.78 acres in area and is located adjacent to the Colorado Technological Center. Johnstone explained that the Resolution of Substantial Compliance represents the first step in the annexation process and is not a decision on the merits of the proposed annexation or rezoning. If authorized by Council, the zoning will come before the Planning Commission at a June meeting. He reported that Staff and the City Attorney's office have reviewed the petition and map and find them, as revised, to be in compliance with statutory requirements. Johnstone stated that Resolution No. 27, Series 2001, if authorized, would set the public hearing date on the annexation for July 3, 2001. He noted that the property owner is requesting an Industrial (I) zoning in conjunction with the annexation. He stated that the property is subject to an Intergovernmental Agreement, the Southeast Boulder County, South 96 Street, Dillon Road and US 287 Area Comprehensive Development Plan, which designates the parcel as Rural Preservation. If approved, an amendment to the IGA would be required during the public hearing process. The amendment to the IGA would have to be approved by the members of that body. Johnstone reported that Richard Lopez, counsel for the applicant, had another obligation and could not be present. Mr. Lopez has asked that a public hearing be set for July 17, 2001. 6