Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 16, 2013 <br />Page 6 of 23 <br />1. The proposed monument sign, located within the 54 -foot conservation easement, <br />shall be relocated outside of the conservation easement. <br />2. The proposed fence and entryway gate, located within the 54 -foot conservation <br />easement, shall be relocated outside of the conservation easement. <br />APPLICANT PRESENTATION <br />Kyle Callahan, Kyle Callahan & Associates, Architecture, addressed the conservation <br />easement and their request for Council approval of a monument sign and perimeter <br />fence within the Conservation Easement. He felt the sign and fencing were allowable <br />under the Grant of Easement to the City of Louisville and noted they are not proposing <br />any other type of uses within the conservation easement. <br />Fire Chief Parker stated at the Planning Commission meeting they did not provide <br />adequate information on their request for a fence and signage in the conservation <br />easement. He felt a precedent has already been set with a lift station within the <br />conservation easement. He stated the fencing and signage adds continuity of the <br />property. He noted there is also liability protection with the fencing. Although they <br />would like to have a full security fence, the fence they are.proposing meets the liability <br />insurance criteria. He thought a trail through the easement would not make sense. <br />Mr. Callahan agreed the sign outside the easement does not make sense. The <br />Planning Commission felt the signage was too large and . so the signage was scaled <br />down. He noted one minor change to the architectural plan provided that the exterior <br />will be light bronze metal and warm gray stucco. <br />COUNCI L COMMENTS <br />Council member Loo inquired whether there are any precedents on what can be in the <br />easement. City Attorney Light explained the Conservation Easement was required by <br />the City in conjunction with platting of the area. Sections 3.5 and 2.5 of the <br />Conservation Easement allow the City to permit the sign in the easement, if Council <br />wishes, but it does not obligate the City to do so. Although section 3.5 prohibits signage <br />in the easement, Council may review requests on a case -by -case basis. <br />Council member Loo asked if the City anticipates a need to get back into the easement. <br />City Manager Fleming stated Parks and Recreation Director Stevens did not anticipate <br />a need for a trail in that location. Planning Director Russ explained Boulder County and <br />the cities of Louisville and Lafayette are moving forward with a trail on the east side of <br />104th Street. Funding is in place contingent upon signals being placed at Dillon Road <br />and Highway 42. <br />Mayor Muckle inquired whether a similar fence could be placed around the City's lift <br />station, instead of the current razor wire fence. City Manager Fleming asked Public <br />Works Director Kowar to comment on the security needs for the City's fence at the lift <br />