My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 07 01
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2013 07 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:11:21 PM
Creation date
7/10/2013 2:16:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2013 07 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />SUBJECT: EARLY RESULTS FROM ULI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL <br /> <br />DATE: JULY 1, 2013 PAGE2 OF2 <br />A strong sense of place does not exist within Centennial Valley. The auto dominated <br />nature of the corridor limits pedestrian and bicycle transportation. The buildings are set <br />away from the streets and limits interaction between uses. There are few public spaces <br />in the area to enhance the public realm. <br /> <br />The ULI committee outlined the varying strategies of government intervention that can <br />be implemented to create change in the area. The first strategy is the “laissez faire” <br />approach and work within the existing structures and agreements. This approach would <br />have the least resistance, but may not enhance the viability for any substantive change <br />for the area. The second approach is to negotiate agreements with the existing <br />stakeholders to encourage the private sector to make the change. This approach only <br />works if all sides can agree. The third approach is government intervention by <br />exercising public powers. Change can happen quickly with this approach but can <br />create political risks and be expensive. <br /> <br />Several special districts are available in Colorado to establish to create funding streams <br />for the needed changes for an area. Those districts include: <br /> Business Improvement Districts (BID) <br /> Downtown Development Authorities (DDA) <br /> Urban Renewal Authorities (URA) <br /> General Improvement District (GID) <br /> Special Improvement District (SID) <br /> Metro Districts <br /> <br />Each district has its advantages and shortfalls, but one option may be better than others <br />depending on what the stakeholders envision can best accomplish the change. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff would like input from the BRaD committee regarding actions the City and its <br />partners can do to improve the economic conditions for the Centennial Valley area. <br />Several questions listed below may help to form the discussion; <br /> <br />1) What challenges for the area identified by ULI would have the greatest impact if <br />they were removed? <br />2) Would additional residential development in Centennial Valley help business <br />development? <br />3) From the business perspective, what amount of governmental help is appropriate <br />for the area? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.