Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> December 13, 2012 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> McClure stated it allows the building to face the park and it allows the project <br /> maintain the Gateway concept for the site. <br /> Brauneis discussed the following: <br /> . Distance of building from HWY 42. <br /> • Surface to be used in access points and parking. <br /> McCartney stated the building is 220' from the property line of HWY 42. He confirmed <br /> the access points and parking areas will be a hard surface such as asphalt or <br /> concrete. <br /> Pritchard inquired and McCartney replied about the differen - pects of the proposed <br /> signage. <br /> • Other developments with similar signage. <br /> ➢ None. <br /> . Is it considered a sign or a mural? <br /> ➢ Sign because it advertises a spec usiness. <br /> • How is the sign lit'? <br /> ➢ Goose neck fixtures from the- op'of the building, downc: fighting. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Chokecherry Dr; stated his support of the project because <br /> it provides a good solution to a community need. He stated the building serves a <br /> specific purpose and the signage requirements in the CDDSG should not be applied <br /> to this project. He requested the Commission approve the full signage waiver as <br /> requested. <br /> Lori Jones, 269 McKi , dis ed th- • for the all signage and the fact that <br /> the proposed site -ve a bi onnec • to the "Art Underground" in downtown <br /> Louisville. She sta • e new Center ake a statement about how important <br /> the `arts' are to Louis S w �ontfinue to be a non-profit program. <br /> Steve Sp- ree , represents • he Steel Ranch HOA stated their <br /> suppor • e proj- <br /> Additib j questions fr. om p, oners <br /> Braunei - ed how ess- al the -ight (8) temporary parking spaces are to the <br /> project. <br /> McCartney sta • e e., 8) spaces will bring the number of required spaces into <br /> compliance with G. <br /> Moline inquired abou other signs for the building. <br /> McCartney stated the other signs comply with the design standards and are allowed. <br /> Summary Comments and Request from Staff <br /> McCartney reviewed the difference between a sign and a mural to clarify that the <br /> requested signage is a sign and not a mural. <br /> Brauneis asked the applicants how they felt about the reduced sign area. <br /> McClure stated he supports the applicants requested signage comments. <br /> 6 <br />