Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />August 6, 2002 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />Planning Director Wood stated that Staff has researched this issue and spoken to County <br />Surveyor Bill Stingle. He voiced his belief that resurveying all of downtown would be <br />problematic and very expensive. He stated that the issue is that, does the City require a <br />full survey cost for improvement or addition to an old town lot. He noted he would feel <br />comfortable with that requirement for new construction or substantial improvement to a <br />property, but not for minor additions. Staff has discussed providing very clear criteria on <br />improvement locations certificates that could be provided by the Boulder County <br />Surveyor. They also discussed establishing several benchmarks at intersections where the <br />City agrees would be a good starting point for surveyors in old town. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that Mundelein's second concern centered on the issue of attached multi- <br />family units versus not attached units. He asked if Staff had received the same request. <br /> <br />Wood stated that he was aware of those concerns but had not received anything in <br />writing. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he would refer the request to City Staff for their comments. <br /> <br />Keany informed Council that the Downtown Business Association would sponsor an <br />after hours get-together at Nancy Love's office. The event is scheduled for Wednesday, <br />August 7, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. The Mayor, Council and Staff members are invited. <br /> <br />Keany asked that Council excuse him from the August 20, 2002 regular meeting. He <br />explained that due to a prior family commitment, he would be unavailable. <br /> <br />Davidson reported on the meeting of the Water Committee and stated that due to the <br />water conservation measures taken and the purchase of additional units of CBT water, <br />if the drought continues next year, the restrictions would be no more severe than this <br />year. He noted that the Water Committee also discussed bonding to purchase additional <br />Colorado Big Thompson water rights. He explained other cities will join the Northern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District and the rights will be sold at a premium price. He <br />noted that the Water Committee did discuss using the water rebate funds to purchase <br />water rights and asked City Manager Simmons for a cost projection on water bonds. <br /> <br />Simmons explained that the figures are very preliminary, however, a 20-year issue bond, <br />would yield approximately $4.5 million dollar in debt service and require a 10% water <br />rate increase and could be coupled with other revenue funds. <br /> <br />Davidson noted that there is money in the sewer fund; however, there must be an analysis <br />of whether the water plant would require expansion. He stated that the water committee <br />has asked Staffto investigate these issues and address them at a future work session. <br /> <br />Mayer voiced his concern that the water rates are not based on usage and if some water <br />users have priority, the rates should be adjusted. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />