My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 05 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 05 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:35 PM
Creation date
5/21/2014 9:56:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 05 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 6, 2014 <br />Page 18 of 27 <br />1. Rate Study Overview <br />2. Financial Plan <br />3. Cost of Service <br />4. Water Rate Structures <br />5. Wastewater Rate Structure <br />6. Stormwater Rate Structure <br />He reviewed the pricing objectives rankings recommended by the Louisville Rate Study <br />Task Force. He noted the rate study overview was initiated by the Data supplied by the <br />City staff; the Financial Plan, Cost of Service and Rate Design. The Rate Study <br />Committee Recommendation is as follows: <br />Financial Planning <br />• Pursue "Smoothing" scenario — phase -in impacts of rate increases <br />• Move each utility toward financial self- sufficiency <br />Adopted Financial Plan Approach - "Smoothing" Revenue Increases from Rate <br />Adjustments of Water, Wastewater, Stormwater and all three combined from 2016 <br />through 2018. <br />Cost of Service (COS) Analysis — The Rate Study Committee Recommendations: <br />Cost of Service: Implement rates to equitably recover customer class cost of service. <br />Alternative Water Rate Structures: Develop equitable rates using an increasing block <br />and /or uniform rate structure. <br />Rate Structure Observations: <br />• Highest Ranked Pricing Objective: Cost of service equity <br />• Single Family Residential — pricing has been shown to be the single most <br />effective tool to encourage conservation: leads to inverted block rate forms: <br />fixed, AWC (Average winter consumption) Water Budget. <br />• Non - residential <br />a very heterogeneous group of customers; makes inverted block pricing <br />difficult/inequitable <br />pricing not as effective; these accounts have a "profit" incentive that drives <br />them to be efficient <br />Alternative Water Rate Structures <br />1. Status Quo — existing structure <br />• Service charge based on meter size with monthly volume allowance for single <br />family customers <br />• Volume rate with increasing block structure with same rates for all customers <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.