Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 05 19

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes April 21, 2014 Page 4 of 11 La Grave stated the Empire has been in business since 2008, and the sign cost $8,000 to change from Pasquini’s to Empire. Based on that breakdown he estimates the sign costs about $1,000 a year to maintain. He recommends a stay to allow for further research but does not believe the 6 month stay will actually make a difference to how the owner and applicant feel about demolition. Fahey stated the sign is significant in all ways as a symbol of Louisville. She recommends a stay to allow for further research on a potential agreement. Haley agrees the sign is an icon for Louisville. She stated she is confused as to how anything can be done without the owner being involved and definitely does not want the sign to be demolished. Fasick agreed with everyone and voted to have more research completed. She hopes the sign can be retained even if it is removed. Cohen stated he does not want the sign to come down either and would rather not be connected with the landlord. La Grave asked Cohen if the owner has been given notice of the demolition. Cohen stated she is aware of the demolition application. La Grave stated he believes we are moving forward on this application on an assumption the owner has agreed to the application. Cohen stated she has met with Malcolm regarding the sign. Watson stated staff has notified the owner as required by code. Stewart stated he feels like he needs legal advice to determine if this is a legal application. Watson believes the application has met the requirements established in the code. He stated this happens in historic preservation often. There are other buildings that have been leased out and have issues but the owner is not interested in allowing modifications to be done to save the structure. La Grave stated he does not believe the HPC can take action on this application which appears questionable. The applicant has stated he has made the application without owners consent and recommends this application be continued until the City Attorney has reviewed this application. Watson asked if staff could get a review by the City Attorney if an applicant, as a tenant, can file an application. Robinson stated he would.