My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 05 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:17 PM
Creation date
6/17/2014 2:26:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2014 05 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 21, 2014 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />Stewart stated we can discuss that after the vote. <br />Motion carries 5 to 1 with La Grave voting no. <br />Cohen stated he is a willing party to preserve the sign. <br />La Grave stated he does not see where submitting a demolition permit is in any way an effort <br />to preserve the sign. <br />Watson stated a demolition permit is required for even preserving a sign. <br />Cohen stated that is his understanding. <br />Stewart stated property owners can always work with the HPC and City to explore options <br />other than demolition and the application triggers the 180 day stay triggering the HPC the <br />ability to work with the applicant and owner.He recommends the HPC appoint someone to <br />work with the applicant, tenant and landlord. He added the City should consider purchasing <br />the sign. <br />Watson stated he would be glad to work with the applicant and City staff because he has <br />studied lighting options. <br />Stewart stated he would want to assist as well. <br />Public Hearing – 740 Front Street, Grant Modification <br />Robinson presented the information provided in the staff report. He stated the applicant is <br />requesting credit for previous work completed in the past 5 years to count towards the grant <br />match. He added staff went through the receipts and has determined they should be eligible <br />for match of $14,010.99 based on the approved criteria. He stated this won’t change the <br />amount coming out of the HPF, it is primarily for accounting reasons. <br />La Grave asked if the $14,010.99 conforms within the period of “look back” as established in <br />the resolution. <br />Robinson stated it does. <br />Stewart asked what was the basis for staff’s decision. <br />Robinson gave a rundown of how he determined the costs. <br />Watson asked why we are giving credit to some items that could be considered maintenance <br />or may be destroyed during renovation. <br />Robinson stated he believed the repairs were necessary for the preservation of the structure at <br />that time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.