Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 1,2014 <br />Page 18 of 31 <br />"to fill the cap of the total cost of a project and the level of private financing that the <br />project can support ". It is not to use funds to pay for as much infrastructure as it will <br />cover. At one LRC meeting DELO requested money for more projects and a LRC <br />member responded it appears you're asking for money because it is there. He inquired <br />why Mr. Arnold is not asking to be subsidized. He asked Council to assess the cap, <br />which requires a subsidy to guarantee a fair product. He stated the intent is not to cover <br />as much as you can with TIF financing. He urged Council to use full due diligence. <br />Alex Bradley, 1385 Caledonia, Louisville, CO, addressed the City's drainage line and <br />noted the scope of work includes a bend in the northwest corner of existing line solely <br />benefits the developer and not the public. The LRC minutes reflected discussion on <br />where the funds would come from to pay back the bonds. She noted it also included <br />the Boom development's 24 units, whose application has not been submitted to the <br />City. The assumption for these bonds does not include projects not submitted. She did <br />not feel Council had enough information to make a decision this evening. <br />Karl Becker, 899 Welsh Court, Louisville, CO, stated he is the Chairperson for the <br />Louisville Revitalization Commission and would provide an overview of the process. <br />The bonds are funded by an incremental value of a property. The LRC had to provide <br />some calculated assumptions on what the TIF model could do. The same calculator <br />was used to assess what TIF could do for other approved projects. As the core area <br />was evaluated, a lot of consideration was made on projects for the public good. The <br />LRC checks and balances will be the professional investors who will buy the bonds. He <br />noted there is also catalyst projects, which will help the area improve and provide public <br />and social benefit. He emphasized the process has been methodical. <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO a member of the LRC <br />stated the fiscal risk for the City of Louisville is zero. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann did not feel it was unreasonable to request the data to show <br />the repayment because Council is being asked to increase the bond cap. She would <br />feel comfortable reviewing the data before making a decision. She stated it would be <br />helpful to discuss the improvements included. She addressed the City's responsibility <br />and the reduction of the budget line item for funding City staff for urban renewal. She <br />felt it was important to revisit what portion of the staff's time spent and whether it is <br />being paid back. City Manager Fleming stated staff can revisit what portion of time is <br />paid back. <br />Mayor Muckle stated there was has been a lot of information at LRC meetings about the <br />assumptions of value for different projects coming forward and the TIF revenue <br />calculated to arrive from those projects. This information can be made available if <br />Council wants more financial information before making a decision. <br />