Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />8.The project lacks sufficient interior directional signage; <br /> <br /> <br />9.The proposed sign text on the west elevation of the building does not comply with <br />CDDSG 7.5.B.1; <br /> <br /> <br />10.It should be noted on the PUD that outdoor sales are limited to 14 days per year and <br />outdoor storage is prohibited; <br /> <br /> <br />11.The landscape plan proposes mostly rock mulch, in violation of CDDSG standard 5.6.I.3 <br />which allows a maximum of 50 percent of mulched areas to use decorative rock; <br /> <br /> <br />12.The proposed roof color should be darker to be compatible with similar roofs on adjacent <br />and surrounding existing buildings as required by CDDSG Standard 4.5.2.B; <br /> <br /> <br />13.The application materials do not demonstrate that the applicant has sufficiently addressed <br />potential noise impacts from the trash compactor and condenser units on the east side of <br />the building; and <br /> <br /> <br />14.The traffic study submitted is in draft form and is deficient in that it does not include other <br />anticipated development in Parcel O. <br /> <br />Seconded by Robert McAllister. A yes vote would be to disapprove this project and would be in <br /> <br />favor of the motion. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> Russ Van Nostrand, Yes; Robert McAllister, Yes; Chris Pritchard, Yes; Sarah <br />Klahn, Yes; Bill Boulet, Yes. Motion to disapprove passes 5:0. <br /> <br />Staff Comments: <br /> <br />We are now moving forward on the downtown project and there will be a Steering Committee <br />meeting in a couple of weeks. <br /> <br />Commission Comments: <br /> <br />Commissioner McAllister feels that the whole parking lot traffic flow system for Avista may need <br />to be looked at if they are going to get people to the far end for bulk parking. <br /> <br />Adjournment: <br /> <br />Meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br /> 10 <br />