My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2015 01 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2015 01 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:38 PM
Creation date
1/23/2015 11:25:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2015 01 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Legal Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 18, 2014 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Loo asked if this would cover board and commission members as well. Light said <br />it would as long as they were working within their scope of work. <br />Loo asked if board and commission members would be covered if they were <br />acting under their 501 c3 designation. Light said no. <br />Light noted that the draft includes language to defend against a Code of Ethics <br />charge. <br />Loo asked if there are any disadvantages to this legislation. Light replied it <br />specifically defines the playing field so there may be less flexibility on a case -by- <br />case basis, but codifying the rules mean everyone knows the rules in advance <br />and how they work. <br />The Committee agreed to take the draft ordinance to the full City Council for <br />consideration on October 21st with second reading on November 3. <br />ZONING AND VESTED LAND USE RIGHTS OM THE SMALL AREA PLANS <br />(SOUTH BOULDER ROAD AND MCCASLIN CORRIDOR) <br />Lipton asked if vested rights should be considered when doing the Small Area <br />Plans (SAP) and if /how existing entitlements might limit what the SAP can do. <br />Russ explained that the underlying zoning of the properties will not change with <br />the SAP. The SAP could recommend changes but zoning changes can't be <br />made without a separate process and approval from the City Council. <br />Lipton expressed concern that residents won't understand that the existing <br />entitlements are in place and regardless of what the SAP says, those <br />entitlements don't change without zoning changes. <br />Lipton asked if the Council could see the vested rights early in the process to <br />better understand what is there now. <br />Russ responded that the yield study that will be done will show what is there <br />today and what it could yield in development. <br />Lipton asked what is the cumulative effect on properties of zoning, General <br />Development Plans, design standards, etc.? <br />Light noted that any changes to General Development Plans also require <br />approval outside of the SAP process. He added it is hard to say exactly what <br />development can occur on any parcel without looks at all of the development <br />agreements and the zoning. It is more complex than just zoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.