My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Local Licensing Authority Agenda and Packet 2015 01 26
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY
>
2000-2019 Local Licensing Authority Agendas and Minutes
>
2015 Local Licensing Authority Agendas and Packets
>
Local Licensing Authority Agenda and Packet 2015 01 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:44:11 PM
Creation date
1/27/2015 8:20:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LLAPKT 2015 01 26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Local Licensing Authority <br />Minutes <br />December 8, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />she was willing to call the police later when she determined he likely was <br />intoxicated and had passed out. He stated the speculation on how Mr. Sanders <br />appeared before he passed out was just that, speculation. In his opinion, he did <br />not feel there was enough evidence to find for the City. He thought not pulling <br />the drink caused problems, however, he did not find that a violation. <br /> <br />Lipton agreed leaving the drink was likely a mistake and felt the bartender was <br />seeking assistance when she called the police. She was concerned with the <br />statement by the bartender saying Mr. Sanders was repeating himself and the <br />possibility of that being a sign of intoxication. <br /> <br />Tennessen stated it did not add up to him that there were no signs of intoxication <br />and 10 to 15 minutes later, the patron passed out. <br /> <br />Machado thought it was possible to show no physical signs of intoxication and <br />then pass out quickly. He noted the bartender called as soon as the patron <br />became confrontational. He agreed with Hughes’ comments. <br /> <br />Hughes moved the Authority find that insufficient evidence had been presented <br />to support the charges stated in the Show Cause Order and that the charges be <br />dismissed. Machado seconded. <br /> <br />Attorney Culley offered a friendly amendment to order the Secretary to prepare a <br />motion to dismiss. Motioner and Seconder accepted the amendment. Roll Call <br />Vote: Machado – yes, Hughes – yes, Lipton – no, Tennessen – no. Carlson <br />absent. Tie vote. <br /> <br />Authority members discussed the evidence presented and visible signs of <br />intoxication. <br /> <br />Tennessen moved sufficient evidence has been presented to support the <br />following charges stated in the Show Cause Order: <br /> <br />A. C.R.S. § 12-47-901(1)(a), stating in pertinent part that it is unlawful for <br />any person to “sell, serve, give away, dispose of, exchange, or deliver <br />or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of any alcoholic <br />beverage to a visibly intoxicated person or to a known habitual <br />drunkard.” <br /> <br />B. Colorado Code of Regulations, Regulations Relating to Alcohol <br />Beverages § 47-900.A, stating in pertinent part that the licensee as <br />well as any employee or agent of licensee “shall conduct the licensed <br />premises in a decent, orderly and respectable manner, and shall not <br />serve a known habitual drunkard or any person who displays any <br />visible signs of intoxication, nor shall they permit a known habitual <br />drunkard or any person who displays any visible signs of intoxication to <br />remain on the premises without an acceptable purpose . . . .” <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.