Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />March 10, 2015 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />from each fund as presented. The cost of service adjustment refers to who pays for <br />each of those revenue amounts. He explained the revenue cannot be smoothed any <br />further because the lenders will want to see a certain amount of revenue to ensure <br />payment for the debt service on the loan. <br />Public Works Director Kowar reviewed the current utility bill for an average residential <br />customer and the utility bill for reflecting the cost of service adjustment. He addressed <br />the FEMA reimbursement for the flood damage as the current numbers do include <br />financing for the new Intake Building. The City continues to pursue FEMA funding and <br />just received a $300,000 grant for the Intake Building. Therefore staff does anticipate <br />the cost covered by the City for the Intake Building will decrease, thus requiring less of a <br />service adjustment in the future. <br />Finance Director Watson explained the City's financing model used to set rates is very <br />reliant on tap fees and any downturn on development will affect this model. The loan <br />agreement that will be presented on March 17 will include a maximum loan amount of <br />$43 million with a maximum interest rate of 3.25 %. The current utility rate model <br />contains a $33 million loan at a rate of 2.25 %. <br />Council member Keany stated his understanding the rate increases cannot be spread <br />out over a period of more years because the revenue stream is needed to pay for the <br />loans. Finance Director Watson confirmed the revenue increases, as presented, are <br />needed for the loans. <br />Council member Stolzmann noted some capital projects can be delayed. Mayor Pro <br />Tem Dalton agreed and stated the only project which could be moved out is the <br />stormwater project. <br />Mayor Muckle felt something could be worked out to generate the money and slowly <br />adjust the residential and non - residential rates to reach the total costs of service <br />adjustment. He did not feel there was much difference in the models. He suggested <br />increasing the rates earlier rather than later and looking at delaying some projects if <br />necessary. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton wanted to see a review of the utility rates annually. <br />Council member Stolzmann suggested the Water Committee meet at least quarterly <br />and review the water use by customer class and the revenue by customer class. <br />Council member Leh noted low in -come residents will be affected by the utility rate <br />increases and asked if there is a program or something the City can do to encourage <br />non - profit organizations to help out. Finance Director Watson stated there are non - profit <br />organizations such as Sister Carmen's who may help out. He noted the City gives <br />grants every year to non - profits, such as Sister Carmen. <br />