My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 06 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 06 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:36 PM
Creation date
8/18/2004 11:31:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/1/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 06 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(SEE ATTACHED) that have been submitted through his office, a brief <br />statement from the applicant, Jack Hunt, and a statement from Lee <br />Birch. He stated that this evidence will show that the applicant <br />meets the statutory requirements necessary for the Authority's <br />finding. <br /> <br />Jack Hunt, 2226 Northglenn Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado, <br />stated that he was born in Colorado, graduated from Western State <br />College and Adams State College, and was married with children. He <br />reviewed his work history and stated that he is a member of <br />Optimists International. He stated that in February they purchased <br />Colacci's Restaurant with the intention of continuing the family <br />restaurant tradition. <br /> <br />Lee Birch, 1216 Main Street, Louisville, Colorado, stated that she <br />was working at Colacci's, when Mr. Hunt bought the restaurant and <br />she enjoys working for and with him. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Initially, the liquor application <br />that was signed on December 26, <br />1992, is it fair to say that that is <br />your signature? <br /> <br />Hunt: <br /> <br />Yes, it is. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Was that application filled out by <br />you, Sir? <br /> <br />Hunt: <br /> <br />Yes, Sir. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Is that still true? <br /> <br />Hunt: <br /> <br />The only thing that would change now <br />is, obviously, I also have a copy of <br />the FBI report. So, the comment, <br />"not sure of the charge," is more <br />obvious. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Am I led to believe, Sir, that on <br />December 26, 1992, you were not sure <br />of the charges that later appeared? <br /> <br />Hunt: <br /> <br />That's correct, Sir. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />You said on your application, "I've <br />been arrested, but not sure of <br />charge." When I read that, I read <br />it as one charge, singular. Would <br />that be true as we stand today? <br /> <br />Hunt: <br /> <br />It was not intended to mean one <br />charge. It means I was arrested, <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.