Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Special Meeting <br />March 12, 2003 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />opportunity for the City to adopt a green points program. He stated there exists a common <br />vision in cooperation with the City and questioned why the process for redevelopment of <br />the South Sub-Area was so different from the Highway 42 redevelopment process. <br /> <br />Ty Gee, 253 Hoover Court, Louisville, CO, stated his understanding the purpose of the <br />meeting was to discuss the current South Sub-Area plan. He stated the comp plan is a <br />thoughtful document and he had not heard any reasons for changing the plan. He stressed <br />the current comp plan captures the feelings of the people of Louisville and asked Council <br />not to amend the comp plan. He agreed industrial property is not the proper use for the <br />STK property, however no comp plan amendment is necessary. He stressed other <br />communities have more problems than Louisville, and the leadership in Louisville has <br />recognized there is a realization the City should remain a small town community. He <br />stated the fundamental problem with the STK proposal is it creates a mini-city, which <br />would be a segregated community. He referenced the STK representative's statement of <br />their desire to maximize their assets and stated a more compelling reason for not amending <br />the comp plan is the maximize Louisville's assets. He stated he liked Louisville as it is. <br /> <br />Doug Grinsberg, 530 W. Sycamore, Louisville, CO felt there may not be compelling <br />reasons to amend the comprehensive plan. He questioned adding more residential and <br />commercial to Louisville and agreed it would be a separate community apart from <br />Louisville. He noted STK destroyed the prairie dogs on their land. He voiced his interest <br />in an Art Center, but did not believe the comp plan should be amended. He suggested the <br />area be purchased for open space. <br /> <br />Nancy Love, 841 Front Street, Louisville, CO, encouraged Council to be more open with <br />the citizens by advertising notices of meetings, including the redevelopment of the <br />Highway 42 corridor. She argued the US 36/96th Street Intersection is a gateway to <br />Louisville and not the backdoor. <br /> <br />Mark Muller, 535 Manorwood Lane, Louisville, CO, agreed residents have to be notified <br />of the new developments. As a member of the Steering Committee he requested the City <br />provide goals and objectives for the South Sub-Area. He stressed it is important the <br />stakeholders be allow to present their proposals without any pre-conceived notions. <br /> <br />Amy Redfern, 550 Orchard Drive, Louisville, CO, stated she is a resident of Louisville, a <br />St. Louis Church member, and an STK employee. She thanked Avista Hospital for their <br />service. She explained her position with STK is to manage and advocate on behalf of the <br />company on government affairs activities, community relations and foundation work. She <br />emphasized STK is a corporate citizen, who has invested in the City of Louisville, Boulder <br />County and the State of Colorado and is proud of giving and investing back into the <br />community. She stated STK has 2,400 employees who come to work in Louisville, 300 of <br />which live in Louisville. She explained STK was built for manufacturing purposes, and is <br />now antiquated and no longer useful. She stated business conditions have changed and the <br />business facility model does not support a high tech industry. She explained many STK <br />employees have moved out of the Louisville area to Erie, Brighton, Thornton and other <br /> <br /> <br />