Laserfiche WebLink
December 9, 2015 Public Comment <br />Steve Rasor, Majestic View Drive <br />Request to switch dog park trail on Davidson Mesa with central multi -use trail <br />I brought a packet for each of you containing a Google map with approximate locations of the <br />impacted wells, photographs, a page from CIP, and articles from the Centers for Disease Control and <br />National Institutes of Health explaining why hundreds of uncollected dog feces can be hazardous to <br />our soil, our household drinking wells, and our health. As you know, after major rain events two of <br />the lower lying lots on my street are inundated with fetid storm water flowing over from the dog <br />park. The first photograph in your packet was taken this spring near the shared well on the property <br />directly south of mine. I watched the water flow over that neighbor's property, our street, and into <br />my yard where it remained for well over a week and even longer near my neighbors' well. Given the <br />odor and the fact that our septic fields were fine, I could only presume that the floating debris <br />contained dog feces. <br />I'm here again to ask for your support to relocate the dog park on Davidson Mesa. Could the main <br />dog park trail be switched with the main multi -use trail? Both the eastern section of the central multi <br />use and dog park trails are in land categorized as Visitor on the open space maps. They both end up in <br />about the same place. I believe this switch would be as convenient, comfortable, and enjoyable to <br />users as the trails are now. The benefit to us would be that the conversion would allow the social <br />trails and trampled, compacted portion of the main trail in the dog park to be re- vegetated with <br />native grass that could hold the soil and capture eroded sediments as close to the source as possible, <br />ideally preventing flooding onto our lots. A hydrologist told me that decay, filtering, and absorption <br />of pollutants occur where water is in contact with soil and plants. The dead and dying vegetation in <br />the dog park do not need to be a story with a sad ending. If the $25,000 CIP funds set aside for <br />elevating the dog park trail in 2016 could be devoted instead to planting seed in the dog park, moving <br />the gates, and adding fencing south of the main trail it would be a use we would celebrate versus one <br />that will worsen our situation. Water runs down hill. The higher a path in the dog park is relative to <br />our lots, the more the pollution will fill our yards. This reconfiguration would allow volunteers like <br />me and others I'll recruit to spread native grass seed, roll it if that's recommended, set up signs like <br />the one shown in your packets, track seedling growth with photographs, and report dogs at large if <br />that occurs. The dog park is directly across from my front door so I'm a perfect candidate to volunteer <br />for any and all of these functions. It will serve your open space rehabilitation mission to allow nature <br />to seek the redemption it desires. Nature is resilient. When native prairie grasses grow, the birds, <br />mammals, reptiles, bees, and butterflies still visiting and residing in our yards will return and the less <br />common birds and raptors would take notice and in time at least feed and hunt if not take up <br />residence there again. <br />I fully recognize this is not a perfect solution. If signs were added posting fines for failing to pick up <br />waste, and pollution prevention regulations enforced, perhaps a new mindset would prevail in a <br />different location. Perceptions that nothing will happen to those who leave their pets' poop behind <br />would change, and better care would be taken of a new space. Given the unpredictability of current <br />8 <br />