Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 19, 2016 <br />Page 7 of 25 <br />property to develop south of streel ranch, which has a commercial /retail component. <br />He addressed the development of an adjacent project in the City of Lafayette and <br />voiced his opinion it is not of the same quality of development found in Louisville. He <br />felt Louisville could do better. He addressed the great recession and the economic <br />meltdown with the elimination of big box stores. He noted the Lafayette property was <br />zoned commercial and the developer, McStain, sold the property to get the cash. He <br />did not want the property south of Steel Ranch to meet the same fate and that is the <br />reason for bringing forth the Foundry development project. They hosted a community <br />meeting at the Recreation Center to receive public input. With that input they <br />resubmitted their proposal for the Foundry. <br />He noted most of the development in Louisville has been in Ward I with the North End <br />Project; Steel Ranch and The Lanterns. He requested Council approval of the Foundry <br />to complete the development. The Foundry contains 28 age- restricted units and 8 <br />non -age restricted units and will be a vibrant development containing retail, boutique <br />services and adaptable spaces for entrepreneurs. The adaptable spaces will include <br />retail on the bottom floors and 2.5 stores for condominiums, which lends toward outdoor <br />living. Every unit will have living space above and has elevator access. He presented <br />site plans and artists renditions of the proposal. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Maloney inquired about the metrics of the design and asked Mr. <br />McClure how the new design differs from the original metrics design, which did not <br />work. Mr. McClure explained the development of the condominiums will fund the <br />speculative development on commercial property. He explained the retail viability is <br />what the property can support. <br />Council member Maloney asked if the developer anticipates the same success as The <br />Source has in Denver. Mr. McClure explained there are eight bays and not quite as <br />many tenants as The Source. He explained currently it models with the potential rents <br />for those spaces. The rents will be discounted upfront in order to get the right tenants <br />and to meet the requirements of the lenders. <br />Council member Stolzmann explained she submitted a number of detailed questions to <br />the staff earlier this aftemoon. She asked whether Council wished to review staffs <br />responses during a recess or whether the staff should respond to her questions at this <br />time. Mayor Muckle requested the staff respond to Council member Stolzmann's <br />questions on the record. Interim Planning and Building Safety Director Russ reviewed <br />the responses to Council member Stolzmann's questions as follows: <br />1) The applicant and the Planning Commission (minutes) cite retail vacancies over and <br />again- what is the retail vacancy rate (percent) in a 1 mile radius of the site and what <br />is to be expected during a reasonably strong economic period? <br />