Laserfiche WebLink
Griffiths: <br /> <br />I would just comment with respect to <br />the conflict in evidence, it seems <br />to me that while there's not <br />necessarily anything that would <br />prevent you from adding that <br />paragraph, that conflict really goes <br />more towards the weight that you <br />would provide to the testimony of <br />the persons testifying to you, as <br />opposed to the final decision. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />(INAUDIBLE) <br /> <br />Any other amendments or changes? <br /> <br />I think one concern a number of us <br />had was lack of proper supervision <br />of the bartending help at the Track <br />Inn. That even after the incident <br />of October, 1992, no formal training <br />happened until last weekend and no <br />informal training happened for about <br />two months thereafter. I think the <br />lack of proper supervision and <br />training was indeed a concern. <br /> <br />Kevin. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />I guess the final thing in line which <br />Councilman Mayer suggested that in <br />addition to a lack of formal <br />training of the employees, there <br />seemed to be a lack of general <br />understanding and general knowledge <br />of the liquor license, liquor laws <br />of the State of Colorado and the <br />City of Louisville by the owner in <br />particular. And so that any <br />informal training given by the owner <br />given his lack of understanding of <br />the laws would in fact not be <br />adequate. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Larry. <br /> <br />He6.ding: <br /> <br />Well. Just for the record, I feel <br />that the events at the Track Inn in <br />the past year, to say the least, <br />were disturbing. Several incidents <br />were indeed of a serious nature. I, <br />however, was not convinced that <br />entirely defensible actions to <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />