My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 05 27
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2008 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 05 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:36:18 AM
Creation date
6/19/2008 9:22:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
5F6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2008 05 27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />May 27, 2008 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Phare presented a handout to Council. He presented <br />websites of other communities that have traffic mitigation but said a lot of them <br />have backed off due to financial constraints. Director Phare said that a lot of work <br />and time can go into developing a traffic mitigation plan and toolbox. He <br />presented Boulder's toolbox and said that Boulder deals with problems much <br />larger than what Louisville deals with. He pointed out some of plans include cost <br />sharing, the expenses associated with some traffic mitigation, $20,000 the cost <br />of setting up the initial toolbox and having the resources to address the issues, <br />setting the bar to high without the resources or funding. <br /> <br />Councilor Dalton asked where the cost of traffic lights was. Director Phare said <br />that traffic lights fall under traffic guidelines. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella asked if the problems in Louisville warrant this kind of <br />project. <br /> <br />Director Phare said he did not think so and added that things are relatively cheap <br />to do but expensive to enforce. <br /> <br />Police Chief Bruce Goodman agreed and said that perception is a big factor. <br />What may be a minor problem can be perceived as a big problem. <br /> <br />City Manager Fleming said there is a potential for unidentified consequences and <br />suggested that the City not pursue traffic mitigation but to continue to listen and <br />remain open to residents' concerns. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella asked about traffic counts. Director Phare said he <br />would check but thought that it had been cut from the budget. <br /> <br />Councilor Sackett brought up the speed signs on a stretch of Dillon Road. He <br />said in the same stretch on one side of the road the speed is posted at 40 mph <br />and on the other side of the road it is posted at 35 mph and said he thought they <br />should be the same speed based on traffic. <br /> <br />Chief Goodman said that the criteria is based on several factors, but on the <br />particular stretch that Councilor Sackett is talking about in one direction you are <br />heading into a curve so the speed should be slower but in the other direction you <br />are heading into a straight away which would allow for a higher speed limit. <br /> <br />Councilor Muckle said that he thought the focus should be on the bigger picture <br />both real and perceived and that it should include pedestrian safety when moving <br />forward in new neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Councilor Dalton said that in general the streets are safe from an engineering <br />and police perspective. <br /> <br />Councilor Sackett said that there will be accidents where there is traffic but <br />thought that electronic speed indicators were effective. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.