Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 5, 2016: <br />Page 6 of 18 <br />Impact of Fees on Participation — A majority (64 %) said fee increases would not affect <br />their ability to participate <br />Follow -up Survey — <br />- The City will issue a follow up telephone survey in summer 2016 to registered <br />voters with further financial analysis <br />- Open Houses will also occur as the design is developed <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Maloney asked about the second survey questions. Deputy City <br />Manager Balser noted the second survey would address the financial piece once the <br />cost is better identified and what people would support for the dollar value. <br />Council member Leh asked about the timeline. Deputy City Manager Balser said there <br />would be two ballot questions, one for the capital bonding and one for the operation and <br />maintenance. Ballot language would have to be ready for approval mid -July, so <br />everything would have to be completed before then. <br />Council member Stolzmann noted she had asked for a cross tabulation for the 20% of <br />people who didn't use the rec center and there were no significant differences. <br />PRESENTATION CONTINUES <br />When the Task Force was presented with the survey and findings, they formed a list of <br />recommendations. Trends included improving crowded fitness areas with exercise <br />areas, expanding the track, multi- activity gym, finding ways to improve the aquatics <br />amenities, expanding youth, child sitting and preschool and a better senior center <br />environment. <br />Preliminary Conceptual Program /Cost Summary was presented totaling $25,162,156. <br />The Task Force will now look at each amenity and try to determine which are the most <br />viable and have the most benefit, and meet the program expectations according to the <br />survey. <br />Council will continue to be periodically updated as all of the pieces of the project come <br />together in anticipation of potentially placing a tax issue on the 2016 ballot. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton understood the interest from the public meetings in outdoor <br />aquatic facilities. That infrastructure is expensive so the design team has been asked to <br />provide designs to tie an indoor pool to outdoor space. This combination would provide <br />use of the pool for 12 months. He felt the proposed changes work well within the <br />budget constraints and provide much of what the survey showed as desired amenities. <br />