My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1994 06 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1994 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1994 06 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:38 PM
Creation date
5/25/2004 2:04:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/21/1994
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1994 06 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AWARD BID FOR LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT <br /> <br />Sisk felt, since there was only a difference of 2.12% between the lowest bidder, Hughes-Groesch of <br />Arvada, and the next lowest bidder, Fischer Construction of Louisville, that it should be awarded to <br />the local Louisville contractor, if possible. <br /> <br />Tami Tanoue, acting City Attorney, stated that state statute states that all work done by the city shall <br />be done by contract to the lowest responsible bidder on open bids, after ample advertisement. She <br />explained that, as of the time of the making of the bids, there was not a local preference requirement <br />that had been established by the city, so it would be risky to award the contract to other than the <br />lowest bidder. <br /> <br />Sisk wondered if there had been background information gathered on Hughes-Groesch. <br /> <br />Erik Hartronft, Hartronfi Associates, p.c., Architects, 1021 South Boulder Road, Suite I, Louisville, <br />Colorado, stated that they had requested qualification statements from the three low bidders. They <br />investigated the qualification and reference information for the two lowest bidders. There were <br />requirements that all bidders had to meet in order to submit a bid. They compared qualification <br />information with those requirements and checked references for both companies and in Hartronft <br />Associates' opinion, either of these companies would be qualified to do this work. <br /> <br />Sisk wondered if there were breakouts on their bids that, if the lowest bid were awarded, would there <br />be a request for additional funds, because of a missed detail. <br /> <br />Hartronft stated, if bidders made an error in bidding the contract/bid documents, they are still held <br />to the requirements of the contract documents, including the completion dates for the three phases <br />of construction. <br /> <br />Lathrop felt the city should have a process in place to give preference to local businesses on larger <br />projects, as they do with quotes and bids under $5,000. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that a resolution had been passed by Council to give preference to quotes and bids <br />under $5,000, but not over $5,000. He felt Council should follow what they unanimously voted on <br />previously. <br /> <br />Howard asked the acting City Attorney to look into the issue of whether or not it is possible for a <br />statutory city to have rules that would allow preferential treatment for bidders above $5,000. <br /> <br />Davidson felt this process was fair and the difference in bids of approximately $6,000 would buy a <br />lot of books for the Library. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council award the bid to Hughes-Groesch as general construction contractor for <br />the Library Expansion Project and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract with Hughes-Groesch <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.