My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2016 09 01 JT
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2016 09 01 JT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:25 AM
Creation date
9/6/2016 11:13:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PPLABPKT 2016 09 01 JT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Louisville Citizen Survey <br />June 2016 <br />City Services and Departments <br />Gauging residents' perceptions about the quality of City services and the job City departments are doing can <br />be invaluable for local governments to set budget priorities and determine which, if any, specific services and <br />departments offer opportunities for improvement. <br />Quality of Services <br />About 9 in 10 Louisville residents rated the overall quality of City services as excellent or good, which was <br />similar to ratings awarded in 2012 and 2008. <br />Compared to other jurisdictions across the U.S. and those in Colorado's Front Range, Louisville's overall <br />quality of services rating was much higher than both benchmarks (see Appendix D: Benchmark <br />Comparisons). <br />When looking at ratings compared by respondent demographics, younger residents (18-34), newer residents <br />(lived in the city five years or less) and renters tended to award higher marks to the overall quality of City <br />services than did their counterparts (see Appendix B: Comparison of Responses by Respondent <br />Demographics). No differences were observed by ward. <br />Figure 6: Overall Quality of City Services <br />Excellent <br />29% <br />Overall, how would you rate the <br />quality of services provided by <br />the City of Louisville? <br />l00% - <br />75% - <br />5o% - <br />25% - <br />o% <br />Poor <br />Fair <br />6% <br />Figure 7: Overall Quality of Services Compared by Year <br />91% <br />• <br />95% <br />Good <br />64% <br />93% <br />2008 2012 2016 <br />Percent "excellent" or "good" <br />Report of Results <br />12 <br />18 <br />Prepared by National Research Center, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.